<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G5 Performance at Anandtech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2005/06/04/g5-performance-at-anandtech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/06/04/g5-performance-at-anandtech/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pallav</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/06/04/g5-performance-at-anandtech/#comment-9165</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/06/04/g5-performance-at-anandtech/#comment-9165</guid>
		<description>It is a bit surprising that people still believe that other Operating sytems are more maintainable when it comes to Web Servers. Since OSX is derived from BSD, it is no more and no less maintainable than Linux itself.

Therefore the cost benefit of using Linux as webservers would certainly tilt the balance in its favour. Add to that the fact that Linux can handle higher loads and the choice should be clear..

Pallav 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a bit surprising that people still believe that other Operating sytems are more maintainable when it comes to Web Servers. Since OSX is derived from BSD, it is no more and no less maintainable than Linux itself.</p>
<p>Therefore the cost benefit of using Linux as webservers would certainly tilt the balance in its favour. Add to that the fact that Linux can handle higher loads and the choice should be clear..</p>
<p>Pallav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokopelli</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/06/04/g5-performance-at-anandtech/#comment-9061</link>
		<dc:creator>Kokopelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/06/04/g5-performance-at-anandtech/#comment-9061</guid>
		<description>Correction: They do not test Linux on the G5.  They merely argue that Linux on the G5 might be a better choice for server applications than OS X.

They are probably right, but it is a bit misleading.  For most websites the performance difference will not matter.  A site that gets a couple thousand hits a day could be handled on a X Server running OS x without too much difficulty.  

Heavy load sites could improve performance by switching to Linux, but at the cost of ease of use.  My main website runs Linux, as are my other sewrvers.  I would not argue that Linux is easier to use and maintain than OS X though.  For a client without an experienced administrator and moderate to low load OS X could easily justify its cost and performance hit based on maintainability ands lwer admin threshold.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: They do not test Linux on the G5.  They merely argue that Linux on the G5 might be a better choice for server applications than OS X.</p>
<p>They are probably right, but it is a bit misleading.  For most websites the performance difference will not matter.  A site that gets a couple thousand hits a day could be handled on a X Server running OS x without too much difficulty.  </p>
<p>Heavy load sites could improve performance by switching to Linux, but at the cost of ease of use.  My main website runs Linux, as are my other sewrvers.  I would not argue that Linux is easier to use and maintain than OS X though.  For a client without an experienced administrator and moderate to low load OS X could easily justify its cost and performance hit based on maintainability ands lwer admin threshold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
