<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative makes claim of having patent on iPod&#160;technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/</link>
	<description>The Apple Blog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Potter</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-16090</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-16090</guid>
		<description>I'm trying to cast my mind back to the time of the launch of the iPod and remember what Creative were offering at that time. As I recall, their effort resembled a CD player, and certainly didn't have a sufficiently large screen to enable (decent) hierarchical menu selection - I think it was a primitive MiniDisc-style two line LCD matrix affair (although if anyone wants to step up and prove me wrong, feel free).

It is, of course, this that I find so absurd. Apple, it is clear, spent a very significant amount of money bringing the iPod to market, and has continued to evolve it since its first incarnation (although, and now seems like a good place to add it, I consider the 2G iPods to be the high point, both from a design and a reliability perspective, and the touch-sensitive buttons of the 3G a low). They have certainly given the impression of being a market leader, head and shoulders above the rest. Creative is just one of the many also-rans.

So why on earth do they have a patent on hierarchical navigation? It makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to cast my mind back to the time of the launch of the iPod and remember what Creative were offering at that time. As I recall, their effort resembled a CD player, and certainly didn&#8217;t have a sufficiently large screen to enable (decent) hierarchical menu selection - I think it was a primitive MiniDisc-style two line LCD matrix affair (although if anyone wants to step up and prove me wrong, feel free).</p>
<p>It is, of course, this that I find so absurd. Apple, it is clear, spent a very significant amount of money bringing the iPod to market, and has continued to evolve it since its first incarnation (although, and now seems like a good place to add it, I consider the 2G iPods to be the high point, both from a design and a reliability perspective, and the touch-sensitive buttons of the 3G a low). They have certainly given the impression of being a market leader, head and shoulders above the rest. Creative is just one of the many also-rans.</p>
<p>So why on earth do they have a patent on hierarchical navigation? It makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Weber</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15938</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15938</guid>
		<description>BTW, I don't own the patents for mp3 player or music player...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I don&#8217;t own the patents for mp3 player or music player&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Weber</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15937</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15937</guid>
		<description>I should sue because I own the patents for 'mp3 player' or 'music player'.. or heck while im at it.. my ipod says 'Patrick!'

They are using my name!! bahh!!

Sounds like creative is angry because their product is inferior to the ipod.. last stand anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should sue because I own the patents for &#8216;mp3 player&#8217; or &#8216;music player&#8217;.. or heck while im at it.. my ipod says &#8216;Patrick!&#8217;</p>
<p>They are using my name!! bahh!!</p>
<p>Sounds like creative is angry because their product is inferior to the ipod.. last stand anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15931</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15931</guid>
		<description>This is exactly why software patents are just plain stupid. Wow, hierarchical menus, how original. Nobody's ever done that before.

Obviously, Apple will take this one down in court. But, seriously, Apple should do the world a favor and just buy Creative and just euthanize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why software patents are just plain stupid. Wow, hierarchical menus, how original. Nobody&#8217;s ever done that before.</p>
<p>Obviously, Apple will take this one down in court. But, seriously, Apple should do the world a favor and just buy Creative and just euthanize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacBlog &#187; Creative 準備要告 Apple 了</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15922</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBlog &#187; Creative 準備要告 Apple 了</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-15922</guid>
		<description>[...]   	九月 2, 2005	 	Creative 準備要告 Apple 了 		 			在 The Apple Blog 裡提到 Creative makes claim of having patent on iPod techno [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]<br />
 	九月 2, 2005<br />
 	Creative 準備要告 Apple 了</p>
<p> 			在 The Apple Blog 裡提到 Creative makes claim of having patent on iPod techno [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
