<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative makes claim of having patent on iPod technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Potter</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to cast my mind back to the time of the launch of the iPod and remember what Creative were offering at that time. As I recall, their effort resembled a CD player, and certainly didn&#039;t have a sufficiently large screen to enable (decent) hierarchical menu selection - I think it was a primitive MiniDisc-style two line LCD matrix affair (although if anyone wants to step up and prove me wrong, feel free).

It is, of course, this that I find so absurd. Apple, it is clear, spent a very significant amount of money bringing the iPod to market, and has continued to evolve it since its first incarnation (although, and now seems like a good place to add it, I consider the 2G iPods to be the high point, both from a design and a reliability perspective, and the touch-sensitive buttons of the 3G a low). They have certainly given the impression of being a market leader, head and shoulders above the rest. Creative is just one of the many also-rans.

So why on earth do they have a patent on hierarchical navigation? It makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to cast my mind back to the time of the launch of the iPod and remember what Creative were offering at that time. As I recall, their effort resembled a CD player, and certainly didn&#8217;t have a sufficiently large screen to enable (decent) hierarchical menu selection &#8211; I think it was a primitive MiniDisc-style two line LCD matrix affair (although if anyone wants to step up and prove me wrong, feel free).</p>
<p>It is, of course, this that I find so absurd. Apple, it is clear, spent a very significant amount of money bringing the iPod to market, and has continued to evolve it since its first incarnation (although, and now seems like a good place to add it, I consider the 2G iPods to be the high point, both from a design and a reliability perspective, and the touch-sensitive buttons of the 3G a low). They have certainly given the impression of being a market leader, head and shoulders above the rest. Creative is just one of the many also-rans.</p>
<p>So why on earth do they have a patent on hierarchical navigation? It makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Weber</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>BTW, I don&#039;t own the patents for mp3 player or music player...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I don&#8217;t own the patents for mp3 player or music player&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Weber</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>I should sue because I own the patents for &#039;mp3 player&#039; or &#039;music player&#039;.. or heck while im at it.. my ipod says &#039;Patrick!&#039;

They are using my name!! bahh!!

Sounds like creative is angry because their product is inferior to the ipod.. last stand anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should sue because I own the patents for &#8216;mp3 player&#8217; or &#8216;music player&#8217;.. or heck while im at it.. my ipod says &#8216;Patrick!&#8217;</p>
<p>They are using my name!! bahh!!</p>
<p>Sounds like creative is angry because their product is inferior to the ipod.. last stand anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>This is exactly why software patents are just plain stupid. Wow, hierarchical menus, how original. Nobody&#039;s ever done that before.

Obviously, Apple will take this one down in court. But, seriously, Apple should do the world a favor and just buy Creative and just euthanize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why software patents are just plain stupid. Wow, hierarchical menus, how original. Nobody&#8217;s ever done that before.</p>
<p>Obviously, Apple will take this one down in court. But, seriously, Apple should do the world a favor and just buy Creative and just euthanize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacBlog &#187; Creative 準備要告 Apple 了</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBlog &#187; Creative 準備要告 Apple 了</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/09/02/creative-makes-claim-of-having-patent-on-ipod-technology/#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>[...]   	九月 2, 2005	 	Creative 準備要告 Apple 了 		 			在 The Apple Blog 裡提到 Creative makes claim of having patent on iPod techno [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]<br />
 	九月 2, 2005<br />
 	Creative 準備要告 Apple 了</p>
<p> 			在 The Apple Blog 裡提到 Creative makes claim of having patent on iPod techno [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
