<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sticky of Excitement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Head</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9332</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9332</guid>
		<description>Oh, and yes, the Apple store (and the iTunes store) run under WebObjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yes, the Apple store (and the iTunes store) run under WebObjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Head</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m gonna file this one under &quot;wild, unsupported conjecture.&quot;

And I say that as a formerly happy WebObjects developer, and currently happy Ruby on Rails developer.

BTW, IMHO, yes, Rails is better for a lot of reasons.  But, WO is great, too, and I&#039;d be enormously surprised if they switched in the next couple of years.  There is just no *need* to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m gonna file this one under &#8220;wild, unsupported conjecture.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I say that as a formerly happy WebObjects developer, and currently happy Ruby on Rails developer.</p>
<p>BTW, IMHO, yes, Rails is better for a lot of reasons.  But, WO is great, too, and I&#8217;d be enormously surprised if they switched in the next couple of years.  There is just no *need* to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Sarginson</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9330</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Sarginson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9330</guid>
		<description>Well personally I can&#039;t see it going away that quickly as there is no technical reason why they need to take the site down to make changes or add new content, its purely a marketing ploy.

Though as it does make you think they are running a coal powered website if they really do have to take it down to make changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well personally I can&#8217;t see it going away that quickly as there is no technical reason why they need to take the site down to make changes or add new content, its purely a marketing ploy.</p>
<p>Though as it does make you think they are running a coal powered website if they really do have to take it down to make changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9329</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9329</guid>
		<description>&gt; I’m much more inclined to believe that the Apple Store is built using WebObjects.

Maybe I misunderstood your post, but the ARS is built with WO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I’m much more inclined to believe that the Apple Store is built using WebObjects.</p>
<p>Maybe I misunderstood your post, but the ARS is built with WO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Baur</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9328</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Baur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9328</guid>
		<description>&quot;as I suspect&quot; = I don&#039;t have a confirmed source. I just see what they are up too and this makes sense to do it. They have the money to do it, and face it - apple.com needs to be redone. It&#039;s 2.0 time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as I suspect&#8221; = I don&#8217;t have a confirmed source. I just see what they are up too and this makes sense to do it. They have the money to do it, and face it &#8211; apple.com needs to be redone. It&#8217;s 2.0 time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9327</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9327</guid>
		<description>Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Truong</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9326</link>
		<dc:creator>John Truong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9326</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m much more inclined to believe that the Apple Store is built using WebObjects. It allows you to build extremely dynamic and flexible sites, so I don&#039;t think the stickies are really there because Apple&#039;s forced to use them.

You might be getting well ahead of yourself by declaring that the stickie &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; go away because of Ruby on Rails, and that this might be the last time we see it.

It&#039;s not enough for some piece of technology to be cool or the latest thing for a sensible company like Apple to throw away their huge existing investment and start over. Especially if the payoff from switching away from WebObjects is not very big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m much more inclined to believe that the Apple Store is built using WebObjects. It allows you to build extremely dynamic and flexible sites, so I don&#8217;t think the stickies are really there because Apple&#8217;s forced to use them.</p>
<p>You might be getting well ahead of yourself by declaring that the stickie <i>will</i> go away because of Ruby on Rails, and that this might be the last time we see it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not enough for some piece of technology to be cool or the latest thing for a sensible company like Apple to throw away their huge existing investment and start over. Especially if the payoff from switching away from WebObjects is not very big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred&#8217;s Journal &#187; Archive &#187; Apple to rewrite the Store with Ruby on Rails</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9325</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred&#8217;s Journal &#187; Archive &#187; Apple to rewrite the Store with Ruby on Rails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9325</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s a guess of The Apple Blog, the Apple Store will get rewritten using Ruby on Rails. If it&#8217;s true, that will be another big achievement for Rails and it&#8217;ll get even more serious attention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s a guess of The Apple Blog, the Apple Store will get rewritten using Ruby on Rails. If it&#8217;s true, that will be another big achievement for Rails and it&#8217;ll get even more serious attention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic Brunel</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9324</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Brunel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/24/the-sticky-of-excitement/#comment-9324</guid>
		<description>If the Apple Store is being redesigned with Ruby on Rails that&#039;s a scoop. Do you have more information about this? What let you think that it would happen and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Apple Store is being redesigned with Ruby on Rails that&#8217;s a scoop. Do you have more information about this? What let you think that it would happen and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
