<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Classic Features to &#8216;Bring Back&#8217; to OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-115943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-115943</guid>
		<description>So many people miss the point that point of (9) is not that the URL isn't stored, it's that you *can't copy and paste it*.  For a long URL, that is an issue.

But, there is a command line tool:
mdls -name kMDItemWhereFroms filename
will report the URL(s) associated with the file, which you can then copy from the terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many people miss the point that point of (9) is not that the URL isn&#8217;t stored, it&#8217;s that you *can&#8217;t copy and paste it*.  For a long URL, that is an issue.</p>
<p>But, there is a command line tool:<br />
mdls -name kMDItemWhereFroms filename<br />
will report the URL(s) associated with the file, which you can then copy from the terminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-114316</link>
		<dc:creator>amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-114316</guid>
		<description>what #57 robertm said. Things on the desktop remembered where they were before, and put themselves away. I was shocked to see that feature gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what #57 robertm said. Things on the desktop remembered where they were before, and put themselves away. I was shocked to see that feature gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Classic Features to â€˜Bring Backâ€™ to OS X &#171; Apple Top News</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-110853</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Classic Features to â€˜Bring Backâ€™ to OS X &#171; Apple Top News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-110853</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zulo</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-102271</link>
		<dc:creator>Zulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-102271</guid>
		<description>I just want to say that I really agree with #19 Deodato.

Well, I use FruitMenu and I think it's good but I thinks it's better if it was a part of the operating system.
With FruitMenu you can also customise the right-button-menu in the same way, a good idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to say that I really agree with #19 Deodato.</p>
<p>Well, I use FruitMenu and I think it&#8217;s good but I thinks it&#8217;s better if it was a part of the operating system.<br />
With FruitMenu you can also customise the right-button-menu in the same way, a good idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RazorSharp iPods &#38; Raw Gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows features OS X shouldÂ â€˜adoptâ€™</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-101137</link>
		<dc:creator>RazorSharp iPods &#38; Raw Gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows features OS X shouldÂ â€˜adoptâ€™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-101137</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago, I wrote a list of 10 Classic Features to â€˜Bring Backâ€™ to OS X. But Classic MacOS isn&#8217;t the only operating system OS X could stand to swipe a few features [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago, I wrote a list of 10 Classic Features to â€˜Bring Backâ€™ to OS X. But Classic MacOS isn&#8217;t the only operating system OS X could stand to swipe a few features [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonderful Toys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 9 Windows Features MacOS X Can Probably Do Without</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-100993</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonderful Toys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 9 Windows Features MacOS X Can Probably Do Without</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-100993</guid>
		<description>[...] The Apple Blog has a list of Windows&#8217; features it figures Apple ought to add into Leopard or some other future version of the OS. It&#8217;s a follow-up to 10 Classic Features to â€˜Bring Backâ€™ to OS X which as the title suggests features from Classic MacOS that OSX needs to have back. The latter is a far better list of wants than the former. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Apple Blog has a list of Windows&#8217; features it figures Apple ought to add into Leopard or some other future version of the OS. It&#8217;s a follow-up to 10 Classic Features to â€˜Bring Backâ€™ to OS X which as the title suggests features from Classic MacOS that OSX needs to have back. The latter is a far better list of wants than the former. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-100514</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-100514</guid>
		<description>I think the bar on the left of the Finder windows was meant to replace tabbed windows. I like the solution more, I always found tabbed windows akward. The way it works now also works with Expose.

I want put away back. Something needs to be done about my desktop, and I'll be damned if I'm going to do it myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bar on the left of the Finder windows was meant to replace tabbed windows. I like the solution more, I always found tabbed windows akward. The way it works now also works with Expose.</p>
<p>I want put away back. Something needs to be done about my desktop, and I&#8217;ll be damned if I&#8217;m going to do it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xleggs</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-99736</link>
		<dc:creator>xleggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-99736</guid>
		<description>What about, "Click, There it is." ?

This was my favorite timesaver- beyond the customizable apple menu. (I used sail through deep catalogs of files completely based on a network of aliases I managed in my apple menu. I miss that ability!)

I TOTALLY agree about the trash thing, and I'm worried about this time travel nonsense- I hate not being able to delete crap for good when I want to.

I HATE permissions, file vault and passwords. I never want my computer telling me I can't do this or that. I'm the boss, no one uses my computer but me, and if I forget my password, that's my prerogative!

Sometimes Final Cut Pro can't find files, so it asks ME to help- and it usually takes about 30 seconds. Isn't the computer supposed to know what files it has, where they are, and HOW BIG they are all the time, never fail, info at my fingertips, serving me the information I've entrusted to it? These ridiculous problems make me wish you could buy 5 minutes with Steve Jobs and make him listen to these absurd problems.

I used both a PC and mac at one job, and I got awfully used to the cut and paste files option. I'm always shifting stuff around between my drives to make room for video captures or renders etc. I hate trying to remember which files are going what direction. 

I always wished there were F-keys like that old system 7 third party thing where you could program the fkeys with long strings of text. Seriously, I could do this in 1982 with my vic20.

My last big beef may have been solved by a third party, but I wish I could mount all my web servers into the finder so they look EXACTLY like hard drives or folders, except they're remote. That would be so much better than Fetch, and solve the dot mac dilemma in iWeb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about, &#8220;Click, There it is.&#8221; ?</p>
<p>This was my favorite timesaver- beyond the customizable apple menu. (I used sail through deep catalogs of files completely based on a network of aliases I managed in my apple menu. I miss that ability!)</p>
<p>I TOTALLY agree about the trash thing, and I&#8217;m worried about this time travel nonsense- I hate not being able to delete crap for good when I want to.</p>
<p>I HATE permissions, file vault and passwords. I never want my computer telling me I can&#8217;t do this or that. I&#8217;m the boss, no one uses my computer but me, and if I forget my password, that&#8217;s my prerogative!</p>
<p>Sometimes Final Cut Pro can&#8217;t find files, so it asks ME to help- and it usually takes about 30 seconds. Isn&#8217;t the computer supposed to know what files it has, where they are, and HOW BIG they are all the time, never fail, info at my fingertips, serving me the information I&#8217;ve entrusted to it? These ridiculous problems make me wish you could buy 5 minutes with Steve Jobs and make him listen to these absurd problems.</p>
<p>I used both a PC and mac at one job, and I got awfully used to the cut and paste files option. I&#8217;m always shifting stuff around between my drives to make room for video captures or renders etc. I hate trying to remember which files are going what direction. </p>
<p>I always wished there were F-keys like that old system 7 third party thing where you could program the fkeys with long strings of text. Seriously, I could do this in 1982 with my vic20.</p>
<p>My last big beef may have been solved by a third party, but I wish I could mount all my web servers into the finder so they look EXACTLY like hard drives or folders, except they&#8217;re remote. That would be so much better than Fetch, and solve the dot mac dilemma in iWeb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brennan Young</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-81163</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennan Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-81163</guid>
		<description>Windowshade was good, as was 'folder tabs' but did anyone here try BeOS? They combined the two approaches, so that the window title bar was a horizontally-movable tab. 

That meant that you could have several windows on top of each other, with their tabs beside each other, exactly like the tabs on a physical hanging-folder index system. The frontmost window had a bright yellow tab and all others were pale grey. (OK, we could compromise on the bright yellow). Switching from one window to another (even a window from another app) was therefore much easier because it didn't require moving or hiding anything, neither did it require a visit to the dock or the window menu.

There were a couple of extensions for classic Mac which implemented BeOS window bars, which I used all the time, but AFAICT there are none for OSX. I miss it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windowshade was good, as was &#8216;folder tabs&#8217; but did anyone here try BeOS? They combined the two approaches, so that the window title bar was a horizontally-movable tab. </p>
<p>That meant that you could have several windows on top of each other, with their tabs beside each other, exactly like the tabs on a physical hanging-folder index system. The frontmost window had a bright yellow tab and all others were pale grey. (OK, we could compromise on the bright yellow). Switching from one window to another (even a window from another app) was therefore much easier because it didn&#8217;t require moving or hiding anything, neither did it require a visit to the dock or the window menu.</p>
<p>There were a couple of extensions for classic Mac which implemented BeOS window bars, which I used all the time, but AFAICT there are none for OSX. I miss it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprocket999</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-80811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprocket999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-80811</guid>
		<description>Ummm . . . the forgotten Classic 'classics'. Being one who still happily does a lot of work in Classic, I do miss some of these features very much. When I have to start up one of my older PowerBooks with OS 8.1 'all cherried out' it does seem faster and all very  familiar again. I don't see why Apple couldn't add some of the simpler things  to OS X like WindowShade, Flash menubar on alert, and Print FINDER window. For those of us who have used them, they are very useful -- for those who haven't, they may find them useful. I also agree with the poster #43 'mnb'. Speed. Please add it! Classic is STILL sooooooo much faster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm . . . the forgotten Classic &#8216;classics&#8217;. Being one who still happily does a lot of work in Classic, I do miss some of these features very much. When I have to start up one of my older PowerBooks with OS 8.1 &#8216;all cherried out&#8217; it does seem faster and all very  familiar again. I don&#8217;t see why Apple couldn&#8217;t add some of the simpler things  to OS X like WindowShade, Flash menubar on alert, and Print FINDER window. For those of us who have used them, they are very useful &#8212; for those who haven&#8217;t, they may find them useful. I also agree with the poster #43 &#8216;mnb&#8217;. Speed. Please add it! Classic is STILL sooooooo much faster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shapeshifter 2.4 Released, Now with Intel Flavoring at The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-80398</link>
		<dc:creator>Shapeshifter 2.4 Released, Now with Intel Flavoring at The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-80398</guid>
		<description>[...] Missing OS 9&#8217;s appearance themes? Longing for the ability to tear your Intel-based Mac away from the horrors of the iTunes 7 interface? Well, today&#8217;s your lucky day, because Unsanity&#8217;s Shapeshifter has finally come out of its seven-moth beta in the quest for Intel-compatibility, and after slaying the Rosetta problems many users faced, it&#8217;s looking better than ever. &#8220;It cannot be!&#8221; you might exclaim. Nay, it&#8217;s true, and below is a screenshot of my MacBook Pro, running ShapeShifter with the excellent dark theme Cold. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Missing OS 9&#8217;s appearance themes? Longing for the ability to tear your Intel-based Mac away from the horrors of the iTunes 7 interface? Well, today&#8217;s your lucky day, because Unsanity&#8217;s Shapeshifter has finally come out of its seven-moth beta in the quest for Intel-compatibility, and after slaying the Rosetta problems many users faced, it&#8217;s looking better than ever. &#8220;It cannot be!&#8221; you might exclaim. Nay, it&#8217;s true, and below is a screenshot of my MacBook Pro, running ShapeShifter with the excellent dark theme Cold. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Fanatic &#187; Opinions on &#8220;10 Classic Features to &#8216;Bring Back&#8217; to OS X&#8221; from the Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-80145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Fanatic &#187; Opinions on &#8220;10 Classic Features to &#8216;Bring Back&#8217; to OS X&#8221; from the Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-80145</guid>
		<description>[...] First off, you can read the article in its entirety here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First off, you can read the article in its entirety here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertm</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79878</link>
		<dc:creator>robertm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79878</guid>
		<description>For me, the most useful part of the "put-away" command (Cmd-Y, I still remember) had nothing to do with the trash. 

It was that it could be used on files that had been dragged to the desktop.

Removing this functionality basically broke the desktop metaphor. Now it is something useless that gets cluttered. IIRC, this functionality was present at least in some version of System 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the most useful part of the &#8220;put-away&#8221; command (Cmd-Y, I still remember) had nothing to do with the trash. </p>
<p>It was that it could be used on files that had been dragged to the desktop.</p>
<p>Removing this functionality basically broke the desktop metaphor. Now it is something useless that gets cluttered. IIRC, this functionality was present at least in some version of System 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry the Horse</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79636</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry the Horse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79636</guid>
		<description>Leora, in list view of an open window, go under the 'view' menu and choose "Show View Options".  In there is a checkbox called "calculate folder sizes" or some such verbage.  Is that what you need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leora, in list view of an open window, go under the &#8216;view&#8217; menu and choose &#8220;Show View Options&#8221;.  In there is a checkbox called &#8220;calculate folder sizes&#8221; or some such verbage.  Is that what you need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leora</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79626</link>
		<dc:creator>Leora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79626</guid>
		<description>What about being able to view folder size from list option? It used to be there, but now you have to "get info" and it takes too long for the information to be calculated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about being able to view folder size from list option? It used to be there, but now you have to &#8220;get info&#8221; and it takes too long for the information to be calculated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry the Horse</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79576</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry the Horse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79576</guid>
		<description>to #50, as far as I can tell, that only works on the last move you made.  "Put Away" would work no matter when you put the files in the the trash, so long as you didn't empty it.  That was the whole beauty to "put away".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to #50, as far as I can tell, that only works on the last move you made.  &#8220;Put Away&#8221; would work no matter when you put the files in the the trash, so long as you didn&#8217;t empty it.  That was the whole beauty to &#8220;put away&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whomever</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79563</link>
		<dc:creator>Whomever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79563</guid>
		<description>I really miss #2 Put Away. Someone suggested ctrl-z, but that's not working on my mac.

The weird thing about #4 is that I have a Petito USB drive which came with 2 partitions and I have to select both drive icons on my desktop when ejecting. I don't know what they did to their drive which makes it work like that...

I miss #9 (url in comments field) too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really miss #2 Put Away. Someone suggested ctrl-z, but that&#8217;s not working on my mac.</p>
<p>The weird thing about #4 is that I have a Petito USB drive which came with 2 partitions and I have to select both drive icons on my desktop when ejecting. I don&#8217;t know what they did to their drive which makes it work like that&#8230;</p>
<p>I miss #9 (url in comments field) too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oomu</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79549</link>
		<dc:creator>oomu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79549</guid>
		<description>why do you love complications... ?

please, keep it simple,  no more settings, no more "themes",  no more choices

and if you so want it,  take a good optional utilities and tweak at your heart.  but please, do not ask apple to complicate os X

as you can see, os x 10.5 will add some more "choices" and dialogs boxes... it's a shame,  you to ask questions to obvious choice or so technicals choice..

do you imagine if I put a "cd extra",  yeah it's technically _2_ partitions, but common users just want to read the contents and eject the discs

not to be remind of "two sessions"...   it's why you have all the unix powers, terminal and disk utilities :  to REMOVE OF the simple UI all the technicities.

I love unix commands and mount stuff and to have powers to use my computers, I also use linux and solaris and I'm paid for that but it's also an hobby, but PLEAAAASE keep my UI SIMPLE !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you love complications&#8230; ?</p>
<p>please, keep it simple,  no more settings, no more &#8220;themes&#8221;,  no more choices</p>
<p>and if you so want it,  take a good optional utilities and tweak at your heart.  but please, do not ask apple to complicate os X</p>
<p>as you can see, os x 10.5 will add some more &#8220;choices&#8221; and dialogs boxes&#8230; it&#8217;s a shame,  you to ask questions to obvious choice or so technicals choice..</p>
<p>do you imagine if I put a &#8220;cd extra&#8221;,  yeah it&#8217;s technically _2_ partitions, but common users just want to read the contents and eject the discs</p>
<p>not to be remind of &#8220;two sessions&#8221;&#8230;   it&#8217;s why you have all the unix powers, terminal and disk utilities :  to REMOVE OF the simple UI all the technicities.</p>
<p>I love unix commands and mount stuff and to have powers to use my computers, I also use linux and solaris and I&#8217;m paid for that but it&#8217;s also an hobby, but PLEAAAASE keep my UI SIMPLE !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parr</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79511</link>
		<dc:creator>Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79511</guid>
		<description>Location Manager. A TRUE location manager, because changing network locations just isn't enough.

As a powerbook user, I can't believe that Apple has missed this for so long. It should allow you to switch not just network configurations, but ALL of your system preferences, including Appearance themes, sound levels, default printer settings, time zone etc., And a Menubar Icon is a mandatory option for easy fast location switching.

AND it would also be nice to allow one to switch application preferences like Safari bookmarks, iTunes and iPhoto Libraries with location manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location Manager. A TRUE location manager, because changing network locations just isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>As a powerbook user, I can&#8217;t believe that Apple has missed this for so long. It should allow you to switch not just network configurations, but ALL of your system preferences, including Appearance themes, sound levels, default printer settings, time zone etc., And a Menubar Icon is a mandatory option for easy fast location switching.</p>
<p>AND it would also be nice to allow one to switch application preferences like Safari bookmarks, iTunes and iPhoto Libraries with location manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Decker</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79487</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79487</guid>
		<description>Uh, for the Put away command? Open the Trash, select the file and apple-z (undo), there you go. For the windows guy, copy/past does work for copying files. Select the file, apple-c, move to the new location, apple-v. You can't 'cut/paste', but I never understood the windows users insistence on cut vs. copy.

The partition thing irks me to.

WindowShade? I miss it a little, but the Dock works fine and Expose is a fine paradigm shift for this functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, for the Put away command? Open the Trash, select the file and apple-z (undo), there you go. For the windows guy, copy/past does work for copying files. Select the file, apple-c, move to the new location, apple-v. You can&#8217;t &#8216;cut/paste&#8217;, but I never understood the windows users insistence on cut vs. copy.</p>
<p>The partition thing irks me to.</p>
<p>WindowShade? I miss it a little, but the Dock works fine and Expose is a fine paradigm shift for this functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Command-Tab &#187; Classic Features</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79486</link>
		<dc:creator>Command-Tab &#187; Classic Features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79486</guid>
		<description>[...] While I&#8217;ve long since ditched Mac OS 9 and earlier, there are a number of features I wish Apple had brought along. The Apple Blog notes 10 of their favorites, of which I only miss a few. Little things like emptying the Trash, tabbed folders, and download URLs in file comments all made Mac OS 9 pleasant &#8220;back in the day.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While I&#8217;ve long since ditched Mac OS 9 and earlier, there are a number of features I wish Apple had brought along. The Apple Blog notes 10 of their favorites, of which I only miss a few. Little things like emptying the Trash, tabbed folders, and download URLs in file comments all made Mac OS 9 pleasant &#8220;back in the day.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Allen</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79483</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79483</guid>
		<description>To add download URLs to files in Mac OS X, check out the free &lt;a href="http://www.ecamm.com/mac/free/" rel="nofollow"&gt;DownloadComment&lt;/a&gt; utility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add download URLs to files in Mac OS X, check out the free <a href="http://www.ecamm.com/mac/free/" rel="nofollow">DownloadComment</a> utility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Vie Viennoise</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79439</link>
		<dc:creator>La Vie Viennoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79439</guid>
		<description>Be careful not to install Shapeshifter or any other haxie depending on unsanity's APE. I used to have trouble with stability on my system until I removed all the unsanity stuff.

Night and day.

I can live with the user interface for OS X (although I've used both Devon's Xmenu and now Butler to provide a useful applications menu and also hide the dock on the top right with TinkerTool) but I do miss the speed of the OS 9 GUI.

Basing the entire graphics interface on PDF is one of the stupidest things I could ever imagine. Talk about top-heavy. And we the users pay for it. A 256 MB accelerated graphics card just to get acceptable windows drawing.

I used to have 32MB main memory PowerBooks which outperformed my G5 2.5 GHz with 7 GB of RAM and an Nvidia 6800 for Finder operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful not to install Shapeshifter or any other haxie depending on unsanity&#8217;s APE. I used to have trouble with stability on my system until I removed all the unsanity stuff.</p>
<p>Night and day.</p>
<p>I can live with the user interface for OS X (although I&#8217;ve used both Devon&#8217;s Xmenu and now Butler to provide a useful applications menu and also hide the dock on the top right with TinkerTool) but I do miss the speed of the OS 9 GUI.</p>
<p>Basing the entire graphics interface on PDF is one of the stupidest things I could ever imagine. Talk about top-heavy. And we the users pay for it. A 256 MB accelerated graphics card just to get acceptable windows drawing.</p>
<p>I used to have 32MB main memory PowerBooks which outperformed my G5 2.5 GHz with 7 GB of RAM and an Nvidia 6800 for Finder operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79429</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79429</guid>
		<description>Select one or more file in the Finder and press apple-p to print it/them.

I miss that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Select one or more file in the Finder and press apple-p to print it/them.</p>
<p>I miss that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Welborn</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79412</link>
		<dc:creator>James Welborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79412</guid>
		<description>Great list.

I miss tabbed windows the most.

Between those and 'show icons as buttons,' I had my OS 8/9-era Macs so customized with tabbed windows, it took me a long time to fully switch to OS X. There are lots of applications to do similar things now -- launchers, et cetera, but I haven't found the right one yet, and I hate to launch an extra app at startup. 

I really wish Apple would hire Tog or one of the other guys on the net who really understand UI design and revamp the Finder completely. Give us a spacial finder with search. Give us full use of Fitts' law. Give us metadata galore and configurability without confusion. Why is this so hard?

Apple needs to treat the Finder as a class-A application. It is more important than any of the iLife apps, and is just a shameful hodgepodge at the moment. Maybe they're waiting for more under-the-hood layers of indirection so they can make skinning the finder a piece of cake... I don't know, but something needs to be done -- especially with so many Windows users on their way to the Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list.</p>
<p>I miss tabbed windows the most.</p>
<p>Between those and &#8217;show icons as buttons,&#8217; I had my OS 8/9-era Macs so customized with tabbed windows, it took me a long time to fully switch to OS X. There are lots of applications to do similar things now &#8212; launchers, et cetera, but I haven&#8217;t found the right one yet, and I hate to launch an extra app at startup. </p>
<p>I really wish Apple would hire Tog or one of the other guys on the net who really understand UI design and revamp the Finder completely. Give us a spacial finder with search. Give us full use of Fitts&#8217; law. Give us metadata galore and configurability without confusion. Why is this so hard?</p>
<p>Apple needs to treat the Finder as a class-A application. It is more important than any of the iLife apps, and is just a shameful hodgepodge at the moment. Maybe they&#8217;re waiting for more under-the-hood layers of indirection so they can make skinning the finder a piece of cake&#8230; I don&#8217;t know, but something needs to be done &#8212; especially with so many Windows users on their way to the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79408</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79408</guid>
		<description>I agree whole-heartedly with #2.

The empty trash dialog was frequently used as an example of a "correct" dialog.  It gave you information that you needed in order to make a decision.  There were more than a few times that I was rescued by that dialog ("The trash contains 150MB?  Shouldn't be that big...let me take a quick look...").  Because the information was useful, you didn't just skip through it.

Now?  "You can't undo this action."  Useless.

That said, I think we're seeing the tail-end of dialogs like this.  With Time Machine in Leopard, you'll be able to get deleted files back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole-heartedly with #2.</p>
<p>The empty trash dialog was frequently used as an example of a &#8220;correct&#8221; dialog.  It gave you information that you needed in order to make a decision.  There were more than a few times that I was rescued by that dialog (&#8221;The trash contains 150MB?  Shouldn&#8217;t be that big&#8230;let me take a quick look&#8230;&#8221;).  Because the information was useful, you didn&#8217;t just skip through it.</p>
<p>Now?  &#8220;You can&#8217;t undo this action.&#8221;  Useless.</p>
<p>That said, I think we&#8217;re seeing the tail-end of dialogs like this.  With Time Machine in Leopard, you&#8217;ll be able to get deleted files back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry the Horse</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79399</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry the Horse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79399</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agree with #41-mnb!!!

Also, been craving the return of "Put away".  It has many purposes, not the least of which is if you move quickly and accidentally send files to the trash that you didn't mean to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agree with #41-mnb!!!</p>
<p>Also, been craving the return of &#8220;Put away&#8221;.  It has many purposes, not the least of which is if you move quickly and accidentally send files to the trash that you didn&#8217;t mean to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mnb</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79394</link>
		<dc:creator>mnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79394</guid>
		<description>My #1 choice for a feature of Classic to be brought to OS X is:

Speed!

on the same machine, boot it in OS X, use it for 30 min.  Then boot in Classic.  This requires an older machine.  Use Classic for 30 minutes.

The Classic UI is so much faster and zippier than OS X.  Even with the faster processors of today, the sluggishness of the GUI in OS X is readily apparent.

Come on Apple, you've got more than enough horsepower, spend some time optimizing performance, we've been waiting 5 years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My #1 choice for a feature of Classic to be brought to OS X is:</p>
<p>Speed!</p>
<p>on the same machine, boot it in OS X, use it for 30 min.  Then boot in Classic.  This requires an older machine.  Use Classic for 30 minutes.</p>
<p>The Classic UI is so much faster and zippier than OS X.  Even with the faster processors of today, the sluggishness of the GUI in OS X is readily apparent.</p>
<p>Come on Apple, you&#8217;ve got more than enough horsepower, spend some time optimizing performance, we&#8217;ve been waiting 5 years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axel</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79388</link>
		<dc:creator>axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79388</guid>
		<description>Many good ideas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many good ideas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veggiedude</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79379</link>
		<dc:creator>veggiedude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79379</guid>
		<description>What? You don't want the font/da mover to come back? How about the chooser? Ok, all kidding aside, I would like to see the OS X 'Go' menu in the Finder to be customisable, much like how the old Apple menu used to be in OS 9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? You don&#8217;t want the font/da mover to come back? How about the chooser? Ok, all kidding aside, I would like to see the OS X &#8216;Go&#8217; menu in the Finder to be customisable, much like how the old Apple menu used to be in OS 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierres Service &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 Classic Features to ‘Bring Back’ to OS X</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79377</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierres Service &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 Classic Features to ‘Bring Back’ to OS X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79377</guid>
		<description>[...] warning would pop up and list the amount of items and the total size of those items. &#8230; And those are the same users that are probably less likely to use drives with &#8230; Second, it doesnÂ’t work correctly 100 percent of the time. &#8230;Read more: here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warning would pop up and list the amount of items and the total size of those items. &#8230; And those are the same users that are probably less likely to use drives with &#8230; Second, it doesnÂ’t work correctly 100 percent of the time. &#8230;Read more: here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Boone</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79376</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79376</guid>
		<description>Another one: a real, true Location Manager like in OS9

This is one thing I really, really miss. The current OS X "Location Manager" is brain dead. As a consultant, I used my PowerBook in many different network environments, and the ability to quickly switch between settings (Printers, SMTP servers, mounted drives, not just network settings) was a feature that simply jaw-dropped my Windows laptop-toting contemporaries. Every MacBook owner has at least TWO "locations": home and travelling. A business user likely has three: home, work, and travelling.

And yes, there is a project already providing a Location Manager service similar to OS9 called Location X, and it works quite well. However, until Apple includes this functionality into the OS as an API, it will not see widespread adoptionâ€¦which is unfortunate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one: a real, true Location Manager like in OS9</p>
<p>This is one thing I really, really miss. The current OS X &#8220;Location Manager&#8221; is brain dead. As a consultant, I used my PowerBook in many different network environments, and the ability to quickly switch between settings (Printers, SMTP servers, mounted drives, not just network settings) was a feature that simply jaw-dropped my Windows laptop-toting contemporaries. Every MacBook owner has at least TWO &#8220;locations&#8221;: home and travelling. A business user likely has three: home, work, and travelling.</p>
<p>And yes, there is a project already providing a Location Manager service similar to OS9 called Location X, and it works quite well. However, until Apple includes this functionality into the OS as an API, it will not see widespread adoptionâ€¦which is unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squashedOpossum</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79370</link>
		<dc:creator>squashedOpossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79370</guid>
		<description>I read all through this list of comments, and it seems I'm the only one that misses the system sounds - audible clicks for buttons, scrollbars, that kind of thing. It was really nice to get that audible feedback from the UI.

But, alas, since I'm the only one that misses it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read all through this list of comments, and it seems I&#8217;m the only one that misses the system sounds - audible clicks for buttons, scrollbars, that kind of thing. It was really nice to get that audible feedback from the UI.</p>
<p>But, alas, since I&#8217;m the only one that misses it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark from SoCal</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark from SoCal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79360</guid>
		<description>Some comments on TASKMENUBAR.

You can set the spacing between icons in the menubar. And if I remember correctly, it also highlights the front most app so its real easy to see.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments on TASKMENUBAR.</p>
<p>You can set the spacing between icons in the menubar. And if I remember correctly, it also highlights the front most app so its real easy to see.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark from SoCal</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/27/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79359</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark from SoCal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/11/28/10-classic-features-to-bring-back-to-os-x/#comment-79359</guid>
		<description>One of the absolute best shareware apps for classic is TASKMENUBAR.

http://pweb.netcom.com/~kawahara/taskmenubar.html

This great app put icons of opened apps in the menubar and what was nice about this was that if you clicked once on any of the opened icons in the menubar, you would bring that app to the front. If you double-clicked on any of the opened icons in the menubar, you would bring that app to the front AND hide all other open apps. 
All this by just using one hand and your mouse.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the absolute best shareware apps for classic is TASKMENUBAR.</p>
<p><a href="http://pweb.netcom.com/~kawahara/taskmenubar.html" rel="nofollow">http://pweb.netcom.com/~kawahara/taskmenubar.html</a></p>
<p>This great app put icons of opened apps in the menubar and what was nice about this was that if you clicked once on any of the opened icons in the menubar, you would bring that app to the front. If you double-clicked on any of the opened icons in the menubar, you would bring that app to the front AND hide all other open apps.<br />
All this by just using one hand and your mouse.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
