<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Predictions for Apple in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Ratzloff</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11206</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Ratzloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11206</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s not going to be an Apple iPhone!!&quot;

Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s not going to be an Apple iPhone!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 Out of 3 Ain&#8217;t Bad at The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11205</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Out of 3 Ain&#8217;t Bad at The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11205</guid>
		<description>[...] About 2 weeks ago I went spouting-off about 3 predictions for Apple in 2007. I&#8217;m claiming 2 out of 3 at this point - and that third is really up for grabs until December 31st&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About 2 weeks ago I went spouting-off about 3 predictions for Apple in 2007. I&#8217;m claiming 2 out of 3 at this point &#8211; and that third is really up for grabs until December 31st&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mockriot &#187; Apple shows off iPhone &#8230; and it&#8217;s called iPhone</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11204</link>
		<dc:creator>mockriot &#187; Apple shows off iPhone &#8230; and it&#8217;s called iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11204</guid>
		<description>[...] Despite what some pundits have claimed in recent weeks, Apple&#8217;s long rumored phone is officially a reality, and it&#8217;s called the iPhone. It&#8217;s coming in June. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Despite what some pundits have claimed in recent weeks, Apple&#8217;s long rumored phone is officially a reality, and it&#8217;s called the iPhone. It&#8217;s coming in June. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Evans</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11203</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11203</guid>
		<description>I really want to see apple go futher with Airport.  The airport express is ace but could do so much more.  Playing directly to from the ipod for example would be a very exciting feature.  Being able to plug other USB features would also be fantastic, such as a USB hub or harddrive.

Also bring on the iTV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to see apple go futher with Airport.  The airport express is ace but could do so much more.  Playing directly to from the ipod for example would be a very exciting feature.  Being able to plug other USB features would also be fantastic, such as a USB hub or harddrive.</p>
<p>Also bring on the iTV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: January Brings Out MacWorld Prognosticators &#187; Applemorphic</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11202</link>
		<dc:creator>January Brings Out MacWorld Prognosticators &#187; Applemorphic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11202</guid>
		<description>[...] The Apple Blog (these predictions are for all of 2007, not just MacWorld) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Apple Blog (these predictions are for all of 2007, not just MacWorld) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mart</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11201</link>
		<dc:creator>mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11201</guid>
		<description>we will so not see apple&#039;s tablet or fuel cell batteries in 2007.

fuel cell may come eventually, but with the next product generation of laptops, which will not come out before 2008. it&#039;s basic economic thinking - they want to get the most out of the current generation before making expenses introducing the next one.

and it would be so not applish to come out with some kind of iMethanol extra batteries.

and tablets... you see the reason why most of us don&#039;t click around on tablets in offices is that they are not so convenient after all. touch screen is a fancy feature but not from the point of view of ergonomics.

moving out from iNames is apparent though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we will so not see apple&#8217;s tablet or fuel cell batteries in 2007.</p>
<p>fuel cell may come eventually, but with the next product generation of laptops, which will not come out before 2008. it&#8217;s basic economic thinking &#8211; they want to get the most out of the current generation before making expenses introducing the next one.</p>
<p>and it would be so not applish to come out with some kind of iMethanol extra batteries.</p>
<p>and tablets&#8230; you see the reason why most of us don&#8217;t click around on tablets in offices is that they are not so convenient after all. touch screen is a fancy feature but not from the point of view of ergonomics.</p>
<p>moving out from iNames is apparent though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tucker</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11200</link>
		<dc:creator>tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11200</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still pulling for an Apple Tablet, and since the &quot;i&quot; moniker will be leaving I&#039;m guessing it won&#039;t be called an &quot;iPad&quot;.

14&quot; or bigger legal sized ultra thin tablet running 10.5 with the newly enhanced pen based input system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still pulling for an Apple Tablet, and since the &#8220;i&#8221; moniker will be leaving I&#8217;m guessing it won&#8217;t be called an &#8220;iPad&#8221;.</p>
<p>14&#8243; or bigger legal sized ultra thin tablet running 10.5 with the newly enhanced pen based input system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Santilli</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11199</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Santilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11199</guid>
		<description>Reinharden - Oh my!

I like it.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reinharden &#8211; Oh my!</p>
<p>I like it.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy benjamin</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11198</link>
		<dc:creator>roy benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11198</guid>
		<description>I think the phone idea is a bit off. I think it has to do something with iChat. A portable iChat machine, with video communication (iChat gets an video answering machine in Leopard right?) Probably some wifi connection, or maybe somekind of network of their own (probably not). It wil not run on the AIM network but on Jabber or something</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the phone idea is a bit off. I think it has to do something with iChat. A portable iChat machine, with video communication (iChat gets an video answering machine in Leopard right?) Probably some wifi connection, or maybe somekind of network of their own (probably not). It wil not run on the AIM network but on Jabber or something</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reinharden</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11197</link>
		<dc:creator>reinharden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11197</guid>
		<description>Surely we can&#039;t stop before something called Lion ships?

And, given that that would give us a Lion and a Tiger, well, perhaps we should switch to bears after that? ;-)

reinharden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely we can&#8217;t stop before something called Lion ships?</p>
<p>And, given that that would give us a Lion and a Tiger, well, perhaps we should switch to bears after that? ;-)</p>
<p>reinharden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11196</link>
		<dc:creator>Galley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11196</guid>
		<description>I predict that sometime in 2007, Apple will introduce a combination monitor/HDTV monitor (no ATSC tuner).  I&#039;m hoping for a 24-26&quot; Cinema Display with HDCP-DVI, HDMI and HDCP-Component, PIP and of course a built-in iSight for no more than $1000.  It&#039;s also very possible they may drop a 42-inch display for the iTV to connect to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict that sometime in 2007, Apple will introduce a combination monitor/HDTV monitor (no ATSC tuner).  I&#8217;m hoping for a 24-26&#8243; Cinema Display with HDCP-DVI, HDMI and HDCP-Component, PIP and of course a built-in iSight for no more than $1000.  It&#8217;s also very possible they may drop a 42-inch display for the iTV to connect to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weldon</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11195</link>
		<dc:creator>weldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11195</guid>
		<description>The only touchscreen device that I want to see from Apple is a $200 touchscreen remote for the iTV that combines Apple&#039;s ease of use and design sensibilities with the programmability and code database of the Harmony remotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only touchscreen device that I want to see from Apple is a $200 touchscreen remote for the iTV that combines Apple&#8217;s ease of use and design sensibilities with the programmability and code database of the Harmony remotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Santilli</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11194</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Santilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11194</guid>
		<description>Dang I thought it sounded familiar, but I wasn&#039;t on the Apple bandwagon in those days.  :D  I&#039;ll edit that little tidbit out....thanks for the catch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang I thought it sounded familiar, but I wasn&#8217;t on the Apple bandwagon in those days.  :D  I&#8217;ll edit that little tidbit out&#8230;.thanks for the catch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twist</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11193</link>
		<dc:creator>Twist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/12/27/3-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-11193</guid>
		<description>Apple has already used Cheetah as a codename for OS X 10.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has already used Cheetah as a codename for OS X 10.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
