<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows features OS X should &#8216;adopt&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: daniel hamilton</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-30538</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-30538</guid>
		<description>To that i would add, 15 suggestions for Windows 7. Mostly for navigation and speed. I now run Vista HB, dual booting with XP 

1. Change the default folder view to Details, and allow one to set what one chooses under that to every kind of folder (i have hundreds, and know &quot;apply to all..&quot; is spssd to do it. Fixes for this do not stay - Google for threads).

2. Fix the problem with Vista not remembering Windows sizes (again, Google for problems with fixes)  
 
3. Put the Up arrow back. It is often faster even after one learns the breadcrumb menu, and is needed when using folders without the navigation pane, which is helpful to eliminate due to Vista not rembering folder sizes. See free QTTab bar for this and more options worth incorporating. 

4. Allow moving of Task Bar buttons, and choosing different colors, as well as saving sessions, just like Firefox allows for tabs (Colorful Tabs extension for the color). Then copy more things from FF for IE. Or retire it. (doing research, I usually run 2 instances of FF concurrently, one of Sea Monkey and 1 of others if needed, and find IE the least to be preferred)  

5. Allow right click to copy whole path in the address bar of folders (ctrl and c will do it now). And allow the same for copying things for 3 d boxes. 

6. easily allow hot keys for fast launching (with  free AutoHotKey you can make scripts to launch one, or even many many apps, etc. simultaneously - closest thing to a session saver)

7 Provide  a master list of everything in the Control Panel, etc, (things like C:\Windows\System32\powercfg.cpl) for faster access. Stat menue should seldom need to be used. 

8. Greatly improve Speech to Text (and vice versa) and commands to do the above (and turn on, off PC, etc.) so you can just say things like , &quot;Go to ...&quot;     

9. Improve ability to see incoming and outgoing Internet traffic. 

10. Can UAC, and use something like Winpatrol.

11. Add options to clipboard, to remember all (like clipboard diary)

12. Improve clock (colors, cpu load, free ram stats, etc.) 

13. Allow changing file type icons on even basic versions of OS. 

14. Put &quot;copy to&quot; and move to&quot; as default options on right click menus (I have this).  

15. Make it faster than Vista, which on a Dell E520 (3ghz cpu, 2.5gb ram) is slower than my W/98 (650mhz, 320mb ram) on basic tasks (navigating, opening folders), and slower than XP on the same PC. Even after tweaking and spare ram and low cpu load. (I do thank God for both, with Vista being overall better and more mature than XP)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To that i would add, 15 suggestions for Windows 7. Mostly for navigation and speed. I now run Vista HB, dual booting with XP </p>
<p>1. Change the default folder view to Details, and allow one to set what one chooses under that to every kind of folder (i have hundreds, and know &#8220;apply to all..&#8221; is spssd to do it. Fixes for this do not stay &#8211; Google for threads).</p>
<p>2. Fix the problem with Vista not remembering Windows sizes (again, Google for problems with fixes)  </p>
<p>3. Put the Up arrow back. It is often faster even after one learns the breadcrumb menu, and is needed when using folders without the navigation pane, which is helpful to eliminate due to Vista not rembering folder sizes. See free QTTab bar for this and more options worth incorporating. </p>
<p>4. Allow moving of Task Bar buttons, and choosing different colors, as well as saving sessions, just like Firefox allows for tabs (Colorful Tabs extension for the color). Then copy more things from FF for IE. Or retire it. (doing research, I usually run 2 instances of FF concurrently, one of Sea Monkey and 1 of others if needed, and find IE the least to be preferred)  </p>
<p>5. Allow right click to copy whole path in the address bar of folders (ctrl and c will do it now). And allow the same for copying things for 3 d boxes. </p>
<p>6. easily allow hot keys for fast launching (with  free AutoHotKey you can make scripts to launch one, or even many many apps, etc. simultaneously &#8211; closest thing to a session saver)</p>
<p>7 Provide  a master list of everything in the Control Panel, etc, (things like C:\Windows\System32\powercfg.cpl) for faster access. Stat menue should seldom need to be used. </p>
<p>8. Greatly improve Speech to Text (and vice versa) and commands to do the above (and turn on, off PC, etc.) so you can just say things like , &#8220;Go to &#8230;&#8221;     </p>
<p>9. Improve ability to see incoming and outgoing Internet traffic. </p>
<p>10. Can UAC, and use something like Winpatrol.</p>
<p>11. Add options to clipboard, to remember all (like clipboard diary)</p>
<p>12. Improve clock (colors, cpu load, free ram stats, etc.) </p>
<p>13. Allow changing file type icons on even basic versions of OS. </p>
<p>14. Put &#8220;copy to&#8221; and move to&#8221; as default options on right click menus (I have this).  </p>
<p>15. Make it faster than Vista, which on a Dell E520 (3ghz cpu, 2.5gb ram) is slower than my W/98 (650mhz, 320mb ram) on basic tasks (navigating, opening folders), and slower than XP on the same PC. Even after tweaking and spare ram and low cpu load. (I do thank God for both, with Vista being overall better and more mature than XP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12638</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12638</guid>
		<description>#74 Dan says:
In Windows, you sort by name, but folders are still grouped together (Lame)
----
I disagree but I respect your preference.
We just want the option to group folders like that to be somewhere. We don&#039;t want it to be the default.
We don&#039;t want to remove anything that&#039;s already there. We just want the option.

#80 Alex says:
Why put another mouse button on a laptop? You already have four click modifier keys right next to the trackpad anyway.
----
I let a student do their spreadsheet homework on my macbook using bootcamp. The homework software was written in flash and no matter what utility I found that make windows see modifier+click as right click, flash just would not respond properly.
But of course you&#039;re just going to blame flash for that.
There are also quite a few games that need a 2nd mouse button and there isn&#039;t always room to plug in and use a mouse when you&#039;re on a bus or in a chartered plane.


chadseld said earlier, “Cut and Paste in finder/explorer breaks the cut and paste paradigm because the ‘cut’ does not remove the original item until it is pasted. This is different from the way cut works in a text editor.
----
I would actually prefer _an option_ for text editors to work the other way. Select text, cut, the text changes color and starts gently fading in and out until you paste it or cut a different range of text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#74 Dan says:<br />
In Windows, you sort by name, but folders are still grouped together (Lame)<br />
&#8212;-<br />
I disagree but I respect your preference.<br />
We just want the option to group folders like that to be somewhere. We don&#8217;t want it to be the default.<br />
We don&#8217;t want to remove anything that&#8217;s already there. We just want the option.</p>
<p>#80 Alex says:<br />
Why put another mouse button on a laptop? You already have four click modifier keys right next to the trackpad anyway.<br />
&#8212;-<br />
I let a student do their spreadsheet homework on my macbook using bootcamp. The homework software was written in flash and no matter what utility I found that make windows see modifier+click as right click, flash just would not respond properly.<br />
But of course you&#8217;re just going to blame flash for that.<br />
There are also quite a few games that need a 2nd mouse button and there isn&#8217;t always room to plug in and use a mouse when you&#8217;re on a bus or in a chartered plane.</p>
<p>chadseld said earlier, “Cut and Paste in finder/explorer breaks the cut and paste paradigm because the ‘cut’ does not remove the original item until it is pasted. This is different from the way cut works in a text editor.<br />
&#8212;-<br />
I would actually prefer _an option_ for text editors to work the other way. Select text, cut, the text changes color and starts gently fading in and out until you paste it or cut a different range of text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12637</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12637</guid>
		<description>#59 jjjjjjb says:
Finally, the ability to rename/duplicate/trash files from the Open/Save dialogue boxes is a great feature of Windows.
---
This is one of the top 3 time-saving features of Windows.


#66 Kyle says:
#1: OS X is a terrible multi-monitor OS. I have 3 monitors, an open app’s menu bar can be over 2400 pixels away; this is simply poor design, at the very least allow a menu bar per monitor. The current bit of design cruft made sense when monitors were less than 500x and 9×9 or so, but the current menu bar model is just embarrassing.

#4: There are no utilities to resize windows automagically (like utils xp, keystrokes to make the window half the size of the monitor and snap to the left for instance)

#5: itunes is generally a piece of crap,
----
ditto



#68 Wenzi says:
May I suggest you stop using a Mac. It would be better for all involved if you just went back to using a PC.
----
...reminds me of a time when a little old lady politely suggested that I take my black ass back to africa. But I&#039;m sure you didn&#039;t mean to say that in the same unjustified, thoughtless and hateful way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#59 jjjjjjb says:<br />
Finally, the ability to rename/duplicate/trash files from the Open/Save dialogue boxes is a great feature of Windows.<br />
&#8212;<br />
This is one of the top 3 time-saving features of Windows.</p>
<p>#66 Kyle says:<br />
#1: OS X is a terrible multi-monitor OS. I have 3 monitors, an open app’s menu bar can be over 2400 pixels away; this is simply poor design, at the very least allow a menu bar per monitor. The current bit of design cruft made sense when monitors were less than 500x and 9×9 or so, but the current menu bar model is just embarrassing.</p>
<p>#4: There are no utilities to resize windows automagically (like utils xp, keystrokes to make the window half the size of the monitor and snap to the left for instance)</p>
<p>#5: itunes is generally a piece of crap,<br />
&#8212;-<br />
ditto</p>
<p>#68 Wenzi says:<br />
May I suggest you stop using a Mac. It would be better for all involved if you just went back to using a PC.<br />
&#8212;-<br />
&#8230;reminds me of a time when a little old lady politely suggested that I take my black ass back to africa. But I&#8217;m sure you didn&#8217;t mean to say that in the same unjustified, thoughtless and hateful way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12636</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12636</guid>
		<description>#52 Leland says:
But, if you want to mix their documents together, you’ll still have to open up the older folder, take the documents out of the newer one, and put them inside.
--
Depending on how many nested folders &amp; files you&#039;re working with that technique can suck a good half hour out of your day!

#53 actiondan says:
frankly both it and Windows should take a leaf out of Linux’s book. Having a drag motion to allow move/resize from anywhere within the window (eg Alt-left/middle drag in Gnome) is simple to learn and stupidly efficient. Why the hell to I have to search for a 1 pixel border/corner every time I want to rearrange my desktop?
--
QFT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#52 Leland says:<br />
But, if you want to mix their documents together, you’ll still have to open up the older folder, take the documents out of the newer one, and put them inside.<br />
&#8211;<br />
Depending on how many nested folders &amp; files you&#8217;re working with that technique can suck a good half hour out of your day!</p>
<p>#53 actiondan says:<br />
frankly both it and Windows should take a leaf out of Linux’s book. Having a drag motion to allow move/resize from anywhere within the window (eg Alt-left/middle drag in Gnome) is simple to learn and stupidly efficient. Why the hell to I have to search for a 1 pixel border/corner every time I want to rearrange my desktop?<br />
&#8211;<br />
QFT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12635</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12635</guid>
		<description>#33 orta says:
Refresh in Finder from 10.4 onwards is useless, the only place it would be of any use is over a network.
--
Funny you should say that. 99% of my work is done over a network.


#48 Guy says:
Well I think that finder should merge folders instead of replacing the old one with the new one. I recently bought a macbook and in the first couple of weeks, I lost two entire days work because I didn’t know that OSX didn’t merge.
--
Despite my best efforts I&#039;ve had this happen more than 50 times in 5 years. Of those 50+ exactly 33 times it resulted in me losing at least 5 days of work. Before the end of the decade this &quot;feature&quot; will have caused me to lose 1 YEAR OF WORK!
Unfortunately I&#039;ve never kept track of all the minutes(hours) wasted working around this &quot;feature&quot; by digging through folder after folder after folder, sorting by modified date and only copying the most recently edited files!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#33 orta says:<br />
Refresh in Finder from 10.4 onwards is useless, the only place it would be of any use is over a network.<br />
&#8211;<br />
Funny you should say that. 99% of my work is done over a network.</p>
<p>#48 Guy says:<br />
Well I think that finder should merge folders instead of replacing the old one with the new one. I recently bought a macbook and in the first couple of weeks, I lost two entire days work because I didn’t know that OSX didn’t merge.<br />
&#8211;<br />
Despite my best efforts I&#8217;ve had this happen more than 50 times in 5 years. Of those 50+ exactly 33 times it resulted in me losing at least 5 days of work. Before the end of the decade this &#8220;feature&#8221; will have caused me to lose 1 YEAR OF WORK!<br />
Unfortunately I&#8217;ve never kept track of all the minutes(hours) wasted working around this &#8220;feature&#8221; by digging through folder after folder after folder, sorting by modified date and only copying the most recently edited files!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12634</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12634</guid>
		<description>Also, some people (my mom) who can barely move the cards around in Solitaire have problems with dragging &amp; dropping. For people like that (and possibly some handicapped people as well) cut &amp; paste is a better option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, some people (my mom) who can barely move the cards around in Solitaire have problems with dragging &amp; dropping. For people like that (and possibly some handicapped people as well) cut &amp; paste is a better option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12633</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12633</guid>
		<description>@#1 Matthew Smith

Wrong. In windows if you click a file and &#039;cut&#039;, its icon &#039;fades&#039; out about 50%.
If you then click on another file and &#039;cut&#039;, the 1st file&#039;s icon goes back to normal. It doe not disappear into the abyss. It&#039;s fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#1 Matthew Smith</p>
<p>Wrong. In windows if you click a file and &#8216;cut&#8217;, its icon &#8216;fades&#8217; out about 50%.<br />
If you then click on another file and &#8216;cut&#8217;, the 1st file&#8217;s icon goes back to normal. It doe not disappear into the abyss. It&#8217;s fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickleberry</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12632</link>
		<dc:creator>mickleberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12632</guid>
		<description>Great article, and thanks @#174 arlen smith for your sensible commentary .. the only person to mention Dual Pane file management. This is something that Neither windows nor mac have built in natively .. and both should consider.

All the hassle around drag / drop vs copy / paste just dissolves when you use a dual pane file manager (for example Xplorer2 by zabkat.com

Just put two folders next to each other (in a single application window), and you can choose whether to drag, paste .. or even use a single (copy/paste) shortcut eg ctrl+F6. Wildly obvious, once you get the picture.

i&#039;d feel a whole lot better about switching to a mac if i knew there was an equivalent to Xplorer2 .. or if this was built into the Finder.

Most windows users have no idea about the enormous benefits from such an application ..
and this is something they have in common with most apple users.

Knock each other out  ;-]

kind regards, michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, and thanks @#174 arlen smith for your sensible commentary .. the only person to mention Dual Pane file management. This is something that Neither windows nor mac have built in natively .. and both should consider.</p>
<p>All the hassle around drag / drop vs copy / paste just dissolves when you use a dual pane file manager (for example Xplorer2 by zabkat.com</p>
<p>Just put two folders next to each other (in a single application window), and you can choose whether to drag, paste .. or even use a single (copy/paste) shortcut eg ctrl+F6. Wildly obvious, once you get the picture.</p>
<p>i&#8217;d feel a whole lot better about switching to a mac if i knew there was an equivalent to Xplorer2 .. or if this was built into the Finder.</p>
<p>Most windows users have no idea about the enormous benefits from such an application ..<br />
and this is something they have in common with most apple users.</p>
<p>Knock each other out  ;-]</p>
<p>kind regards, michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pila</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12631</link>
		<dc:creator>Pila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12631</guid>
		<description>this shit dont have what i need omfg...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this shit dont have what i need omfg&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12630</guid>
		<description>Having used a Windows for years, I recently started using an iMac. I&#039;m not an Apple fanboy and I can safely say that are a lot of things in Windows that they got right; better than Apple. My biggest peeve is resizing windows. They really should improve that@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having used a Windows for years, I recently started using an iMac. I&#8217;m not an Apple fanboy and I can safely say that are a lot of things in Windows that they got right; better than Apple. My biggest peeve is resizing windows. They really should improve that@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirek2</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12629</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirek2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12629</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually been annoyed with Mac OS X since I switched for entirely different reasons. Hence, I&#039;m adding them to your list:
 - Dock should show open windows, not just open applications. The Mac behavior starts to bug when working with, for example, two documents, one of which contains some information and the other, let&#039;s say, is an essay you&#039;re writing based on the info. And let&#039;s say perhaps you also need to occasionally look up stuff in Safari. Switching back and forth between the three windows is awful, believe me. Go on, try it.
 - Selection should work differently. If I select one file more than I intended to, Shift-arrow (in the opposite direction) should select one less file, not one more file above my selection.
 - Folders should be sorted on top, not between documents. (Just like in real life...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually been annoyed with Mac OS X since I switched for entirely different reasons. Hence, I&#8217;m adding them to your list:<br />
 &#8211; Dock should show open windows, not just open applications. The Mac behavior starts to bug when working with, for example, two documents, one of which contains some information and the other, let&#8217;s say, is an essay you&#8217;re writing based on the info. And let&#8217;s say perhaps you also need to occasionally look up stuff in Safari. Switching back and forth between the three windows is awful, believe me. Go on, try it.<br />
 &#8211; Selection should work differently. If I select one file more than I intended to, Shift-arrow (in the opposite direction) should select one less file, not one more file above my selection.<br />
 &#8211; Folders should be sorted on top, not between documents. (Just like in real life&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cawpin</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12627</link>
		<dc:creator>cawpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12627</guid>
		<description>@#123 55IsABigLie

Right click on a folder and  click properties. Ta-da! recursive file count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#123 55IsABigLie</p>
<p>Right click on a folder and  click properties. Ta-da! recursive file count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top News Apple &#187; Windows features OS X should ‘adopt’</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12628</link>
		<dc:creator>Top News Apple &#187; Windows features OS X should ‘adopt’</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12628</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimaldello &#187; Windows kopieren</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12626</link>
		<dc:creator>Grimaldello &#187; Windows kopieren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12626</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows features OS X should&#160;&#8216;adopt&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows features OS X should&#160;&lsquo;adopt&rsquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12625</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12625</guid>
		<description>My son has been a PC guy for a long time and has just begun to use the Mac for Web development. But he has really only three things that drive him crazy in the OS X world.

1. Not being able to have an application take over the full screen so that you cannot click out of your current app by accident.
2. Resizing the window from any of its sides.
3. Not being able to use drop down lists with the arrow keys, i.e. in photoshop not being able to easily scan through multiple fonts by simply using the down arrow and see the changes on the selected font, instead having to click on each font, this is a real deficiency in lots of apps or just in the whole OS X environment, I am not sure which</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son has been a PC guy for a long time and has just begun to use the Mac for Web development. But he has really only three things that drive him crazy in the OS X world.</p>
<p>1. Not being able to have an application take over the full screen so that you cannot click out of your current app by accident.<br />
2. Resizing the window from any of its sides.<br />
3. Not being able to use drop down lists with the arrow keys, i.e. in photoshop not being able to easily scan through multiple fonts by simply using the down arrow and see the changes on the selected font, instead having to click on each font, this is a real deficiency in lots of apps or just in the whole OS X environment, I am not sure which</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preoccupations</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12624</link>
		<dc:creator>Preoccupations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12624</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Post-Platform...&lt;/strong&gt;

Time was (and not long ago) that it seemed like it was Mac vs Windows fanwars all the time. Good to see we&#039;re moving on: &#039;While Windows and Mac users alike get a kick out of making fun of PC,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Post-Platform&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Time was (and not long ago) that it seemed like it was Mac vs Windows fanwars all the time. Good to see we&#8217;re moving on: &#8216;While Windows and Mac users alike get a kick out of making fun of PC,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arlen smith</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12623</link>
		<dc:creator>arlen smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12623</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so funny to hear people defend the mac OS as something that could be &quot;ruined&quot; by features that they simply wouldn&#039;t need to invoke if they prefer the more labor intesive UI paradigm. I can tell you from a lifetime of using both OS&#039;s that Apple should take a page from MS and lose a little of the ego, shamelessly copy the other guy&#039;s useful features, and don&#039;t wait 10 years to do it. (2-button mouse) Windows has shamelessly done it, and it&#039;s improved usability. Apple has always been against giving people options, as it&#039;s something &quot;Windows does&quot;. Apple knows the best way to use your computer, why would you need options? That attitude could cost them the opportunity to gain a huge market share. Accept that people use computers differently, even accept that Windows/Linux users are used to a certain paradigm and *gasp* placate them with options. Options. Keep your drag and drop, one mouse button, hold down the button forever UI. But give power users the features they want as options and your OS will dominate. Here are the things you can list under &quot;Let&#039;s get real already, people want to get work done.&quot;

1. Dual pane option for finder.

2. Drag a window from any edge. No brainer. Don&#039;t even argue.

3. Don&#039;t make me drag everything around all over the place.
Give me the option to work more quickly with less mousing -- Cut and Paste.

4. Option to de-candy the entire interface. OS X, despite the hype has always been the sluggish OS in terms of responsiveness, by leagues compared to Windows on comparable hardware. Time to give us the option to cut the fat and make it more responsive. I want instant resposnse from everything in my interface, no bouncing, no flying, no delaying. Just response. When I click my cursor into a window or field, I want it there instantly because I&#039;m instantly typing.

5. Just accept that there are users out there who aren&#039;t drinking the kool-aid and just want to get work done, could care less about the users who worry about a feature being &quot;ugly&quot;, don&#039;t care that much about animation or the appearance of chrome. People who just plain work on computers, and get their enjoyment/entertainment out in the real world. People who actually look at &quot;Mac guy&quot; on the commercials and don&#039;t want to be like him, who find him smug and irritating.

6. (hardware) Give the notebooks two mouse buttons already. My Lord! How stubborn can you be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so funny to hear people defend the mac OS as something that could be &#8220;ruined&#8221; by features that they simply wouldn&#8217;t need to invoke if they prefer the more labor intesive UI paradigm. I can tell you from a lifetime of using both OS&#8217;s that Apple should take a page from MS and lose a little of the ego, shamelessly copy the other guy&#8217;s useful features, and don&#8217;t wait 10 years to do it. (2-button mouse) Windows has shamelessly done it, and it&#8217;s improved usability. Apple has always been against giving people options, as it&#8217;s something &#8220;Windows does&#8221;. Apple knows the best way to use your computer, why would you need options? That attitude could cost them the opportunity to gain a huge market share. Accept that people use computers differently, even accept that Windows/Linux users are used to a certain paradigm and *gasp* placate them with options. Options. Keep your drag and drop, one mouse button, hold down the button forever UI. But give power users the features they want as options and your OS will dominate. Here are the things you can list under &#8220;Let&#8217;s get real already, people want to get work done.&#8221;</p>
<p>1. Dual pane option for finder.</p>
<p>2. Drag a window from any edge. No brainer. Don&#8217;t even argue.</p>
<p>3. Don&#8217;t make me drag everything around all over the place.<br />
Give me the option to work more quickly with less mousing &#8212; Cut and Paste.</p>
<p>4. Option to de-candy the entire interface. OS X, despite the hype has always been the sluggish OS in terms of responsiveness, by leagues compared to Windows on comparable hardware. Time to give us the option to cut the fat and make it more responsive. I want instant resposnse from everything in my interface, no bouncing, no flying, no delaying. Just response. When I click my cursor into a window or field, I want it there instantly because I&#8217;m instantly typing.</p>
<p>5. Just accept that there are users out there who aren&#8217;t drinking the kool-aid and just want to get work done, could care less about the users who worry about a feature being &#8220;ugly&#8221;, don&#8217;t care that much about animation or the appearance of chrome. People who just plain work on computers, and get their enjoyment/entertainment out in the real world. People who actually look at &#8220;Mac guy&#8221; on the commercials and don&#8217;t want to be like him, who find him smug and irritating.</p>
<p>6. (hardware) Give the notebooks two mouse buttons already. My Lord! How stubborn can you be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casi Dougal</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12622</link>
		<dc:creator>Casi Dougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12622</guid>
		<description>I recently switched my production environment from XP to Mac OS X.

My number one issue is the separation of the menu bar from application windows...in particular as I&#039;m using an extended display / dual monitor off my MacBook. I keep thinking there&#039;s got to be a way to keep it with the application Window but as of yet I&#039;ve been able to find a hack. If I would have been aware of this before hand I probably wouldn&#039;t have made the switch.

While the Mac has lots of better features than Windows...they seem to be in la la land on some basics. On the hardware side, I am still dumbfounded that MacBooks have no port replicator / docking stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently switched my production environment from XP to Mac OS X.</p>
<p>My number one issue is the separation of the menu bar from application windows&#8230;in particular as I&#8217;m using an extended display / dual monitor off my MacBook. I keep thinking there&#8217;s got to be a way to keep it with the application Window but as of yet I&#8217;ve been able to find a hack. If I would have been aware of this before hand I probably wouldn&#8217;t have made the switch.</p>
<p>While the Mac has lots of better features than Windows&#8230;they seem to be in la la land on some basics. On the hardware side, I am still dumbfounded that MacBooks have no port replicator / docking stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seikon</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12621</link>
		<dc:creator>Seikon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 00:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12621</guid>
		<description>brian d, you are an idiot. You are a windoze using idiot and should upgrade to a REAL OS. The screen reads right to left which means that A-Z works on the same principle. Use your tiny Microsoft dominated brain and realise that that is how the icons are arranged! How many thought cycles would that take. Could you do that for me? Hmm? Thank you.

Adam, it is windoze because compared to OS X, it is basic and primitive and guess what, Bill Gates doesnt care either but he sure as hell does care what Apple is doing because Vista is basically micro$oft&#039;s copy of OS X...except with nothing done right.
And in-case you&#039;re wondering, I have both a PC running windows and a mac but you can probably guess which I prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brian d, you are an idiot. You are a windoze using idiot and should upgrade to a REAL OS. The screen reads right to left which means that A-Z works on the same principle. Use your tiny Microsoft dominated brain and realise that that is how the icons are arranged! How many thought cycles would that take. Could you do that for me? Hmm? Thank you.</p>
<p>Adam, it is windoze because compared to OS X, it is basic and primitive and guess what, Bill Gates doesnt care either but he sure as hell does care what Apple is doing because Vista is basically micro$oft&#8217;s copy of OS X&#8230;except with nothing done right.<br />
And in-case you&#8217;re wondering, I have both a PC running windows and a mac but you can probably guess which I prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12619</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/01/29/windows-features-os-x-should-adopt/#comment-12619</guid>
		<description>1. It&#039;s not windoze.

2. It will never be windoze.

3. Steve Jobs does not care what you want from windoze.

4. If having to do a few things different bothers you so much, then...

5. Switch back to windoze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. It&#8217;s not windoze.</p>
<p>2. It will never be windoze.</p>
<p>3. Steve Jobs does not care what you want from windoze.</p>
<p>4. If having to do a few things different bothers you so much, then&#8230;</p>
<p>5. Switch back to windoze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
