<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone&#8217;s iPod Functions a Nice Step Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101543</link>
		<dc:creator>Galley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101543</guid>
		<description>Flicking the screen repeatedly to scroll through a long list seems to take too long.  I'd rather see a jog lever, or better yet a flat analog joystick that would work in both orientations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flicking the screen repeatedly to scroll through a long list seems to take too long.  I&#8217;d rather see a jog lever, or better yet a flat analog joystick that would work in both orientations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Korleski</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101528</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Korleski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101528</guid>
		<description>I can't wait to get my hands on the iPhone. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on the iPhone. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azzamallow</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101522</link>
		<dc:creator>azzamallow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101522</guid>
		<description>Expect to see it some time soon, and when they do it will work exactly like it does in the iPhone, except with the wheel. I dont know how they would manage cover flow, they may decide to scrap that until full screen happens on regular iPods. 

Im starting to use the cover flow alot more on my iTunes, i would love to see it in my iPod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect to see it some time soon, and when they do it will work exactly like it does in the iPhone, except with the wheel. I dont know how they would manage cover flow, they may decide to scrap that until full screen happens on regular iPods. </p>
<p>Im starting to use the cover flow alot more on my iTunes, i would love to see it in my iPod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanni</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101509</link>
		<dc:creator>vanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101509</guid>
		<description>iPod WS will up the ante on mp3 palyers. i am looking forward to the next generation of iPods!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPod WS will up the ante on mp3 palyers. i am looking forward to the next generation of iPods!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hackand</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101504</link>
		<dc:creator>hackand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101504</guid>
		<description>I think too that it will be on the 6G iPod, and I really hope that it comes out before April.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think too that it will be on the 6G iPod, and I really hope that it comes out before April.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLU</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101502</link>
		<dc:creator>DLU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101502</guid>
		<description>i think touchscreen is the wave of the future for apple.  Mr. Jobs mentioned that there were exciting things to come w/ the macs over the course of the year, and i believe that touch screen integration in the laptops and the ipods will be the major theme of this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think touchscreen is the wave of the future for apple.  Mr. Jobs mentioned that there were exciting things to come w/ the macs over the course of the year, and i believe that touch screen integration in the laptops and the ipods will be the major theme of this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael May</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101493</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101493</guid>
		<description>Yeah I think we'll get it in the 6G iPod. Why wouldn't apple do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think we&#8217;ll get it in the 6G iPod. Why wouldn&#8217;t apple do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wph</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101491</link>
		<dc:creator>wph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101491</guid>
		<description>I bet we'll see it in the next iteration of the iPod.
Whether that will be a "true video iPod", or if it will come before june, I don't know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet we&#8217;ll see it in the next iteration of the iPod.<br />
Whether that will be a &#8220;true video iPod&#8221;, or if it will come before june, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101489</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/02/05/iphones-ipod-functions-a-nice-step-forward/#comment-101489</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that perhaps the widescreen i-pod might come out before the i-phone. Apple would then ship loads of W-i-pods and then market the i-phone heavily towards the middle of the year. The more we get into the year the more this becomes unfeasible.  I don't think, however , that we will see a new iteration of any large-scale i-pod without these controls.  Lets face it anything half way between the current i-pod model and the i-phone just wouldn't sell. We have tasted the peroni so why go for the bud?

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that perhaps the widescreen i-pod might come out before the i-phone. Apple would then ship loads of W-i-pods and then market the i-phone heavily towards the middle of the year. The more we get into the year the more this becomes unfeasible.  I don&#8217;t think, however , that we will see a new iteration of any large-scale i-pod without these controls.  Lets face it anything half way between the current i-pod model and the i-phone just wouldn&#8217;t sell. We have tasted the peroni so why go for the bud?</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
