Well I got apple battery from a local store, and opened my iPhone, but unfortunately i messed up alot of things, i plucked the battery, without nowing that i will damage the circuit, as you can see the bellow images, i have spent more then 10 hours continuous to solve the problem. Let me explain it to you guys….

details and circuit diagram on
http://aamirrajpoot.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/iphone-battery-the-dead-block/

http://www.rechargeable-battery.us

That is, however, until you use the 802.11 - Then it is like a Sherman Tank with a 2 gallon gas tank

With that off and NO use of the iPOD function, the battery time is better than 40 minutes…but frankly not as much as I would expect…

I am sure it will do well - Despite owning both MAC and PC equipment, and realizing that they both offer benefits, I have become bored with the MAC community acting like Lemmings when it comes to MAC stuff - PC people could care less… I Love my MAC - I Love my T60P Thinkpad too - I like plugging my iPOD into my car - As for the iPhone… So far it has proven to be a serious waste of cash - Granted it IS a cool/fun toy… But just a Toy… perhaps the next generation…. (and before someone says it, yes I DID run like a fool to get my iPhone day one WITHOUT hesitation)

It is funny now some many months later that we are looking at a battery life closer to 8 hours than 80 minutes.

More like, THERE’S a reason NOT to get a WINDOZE smartphone.

As for the lack of replaceable battery in the iPhone ? no thanks I’ll be sticking with Symbian for the time being. Symbian NO nosense, NO lockups, NO rebooting.

No, Dvorak wasn’t “right” about “MS on Mac”.

The history is that he first said Apple would switch to Intel, partly because he didn’t believe the PowerPC 970 (G5) processor existed. At all. And then, guess what? IBM delivered the PowerPC 970, and Apple shipped the Power Mac G5 for about the next three years.

When Apple *did* announce it was switching to Intel, some idiots thought Dvorak was “right”. No, he wasn’t “right”. Or, rather, he was “right” in the same way a broken watch is “right” two times a day. Dvorak predicting that Apple would switch to Intel was totally unrelated to the fact that they did four years later.

Next, Dvorak predicted that Apple would discontinue Mac OS X, switch to Windows (Vista, specifically), and essentially become a speciality PC retailer. Wrong again. The fact that Windows can be run in virtual machines and via Boot Camp on Intel-based Macs is incidental and unrelated to Dvorak’s claim that Apple would drop Mac OS X and “switch” to Windows.

Dvorak has publicly admitted to openly trolling Apple users to get hits for his articles. In fact, that admission is probably a carefully crafted troll in itself. He has been wrong about nearly every major prediction he has made, especially ones that involve Apple, and this ‘iPhone battery only lasts 40 minutes’ garbage is utter BS, and just reeks of typical Dvorak trolling. There are too many things wrong with that statement to list, but even on the off chance he really did talk to someone at Cingular “testing” the phone, judgments can’t be made about prerelease, non-FCC-approved prototypes and test mules. There is no reason to believe iPhone’s battery life won’t be manifestly what Apple says it is in the specifications (or out of any similar margin with respect to what any other manufacturer claims about their own battery lives), and that will be easily proven when the iPhone ships. I’m sure the heaviest users of fullscreen video, etc., will complain about short battery life, and I’m sure we’ll see a flurry of articles about it, especially from those who carp about the battery not being replaceable on the fly. Well guess what? Those people didn’t have to buy iPhones, did they?

Sheesh.

I’m not sucked up in the hype for iPhone but this is really a non-story and certainly not specific to Apple.

Where’s the ‘report post’ link on this site???