<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why new iPods aren&#8217;t quite as good as old iPods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dancinjoe</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-122251</link>
		<dc:creator>Dancinjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-122251</guid>
		<description>BTF, What about the fact that the new iPod touch no longer works with half the docking stations and alomst all direct connect car connections. Even the Bose speaker system no longer works with the new iPod Touch! A point they really should have focused a little more on.Had I know ahead of time, I wouldn't have switch to the new one.     Very Lame on Apples part.    Who wants to connent through a headphone jack, that is a terrible sound choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTF, What about the fact that the new iPod touch no longer works with half the docking stations and alomst all direct connect car connections. Even the Bose speaker system no longer works with the new iPod Touch! A point they really should have focused a little more on.Had I know ahead of time, I wouldn&#8217;t have switch to the new one.     Very Lame on Apples part.    Who wants to connent through a headphone jack, that is a terrible sound choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTF</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-121428</link>
		<dc:creator>BTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-121428</guid>
		<description>u peeps got sum serious issues, talkin bout stupid features, its all about knowing how to use the ipod. if youre havin problems then ur a NOOB so STFU bout ur stupid problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u peeps got sum serious issues, talkin bout stupid features, its all about knowing how to use the ipod. if youre havin problems then ur a NOOB so STFU bout ur stupid problems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BN</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-121188</link>
		<dc:creator>BN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-121188</guid>
		<description>What I find most irritating is that my old iPod Nano used to charge when I plugged it into a base station player AND when I plugged it into my car, thus I never had to worry about the battery running low.  I just bought the new 8GB Nano and I found out it no longer charges on these accessories.  L-A-M-E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find most irritating is that my old iPod Nano used to charge when I plugged it into a base station player AND when I plugged it into my car, thus I never had to worry about the battery running low.  I just bought the new 8GB Nano and I found out it no longer charges on these accessories.  L-A-M-E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Apple could launch the iPhone (and ship 3m devices) globally on 9th June - Life @ 36</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-119476</link>
		<dc:creator>How Apple could launch the iPhone (and ship 3m devices) globally on 9th June - Life @ 36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-119476</guid>
		<description>[...] stock to where demand is (remember Apple changed the iPod range a few years back so that they no longer ship with a power adaptor, much to the disdain of customers).   Here&#8217;s my theory about all of this and how Apple are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stock to where demand is (remember Apple changed the iPod range a few years back so that they no longer ship with a power adaptor, much to the disdain of customers).   Here&#8217;s my theory about all of this and how Apple are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt E</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-114129</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-114129</guid>
		<description>The lack of firewire sucks!

I don't have usb2. my older g4 mac works fine still so i'm not about to upgrade it for a USB port.

The transfer speeds with USB1 are a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of firewire sucks!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have usb2. my older g4 mac works fine still so i&#8217;m not about to upgrade it for a USB port.</p>
<p>The transfer speeds with USB1 are a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K'D</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-112970</link>
		<dc:creator>K'D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-112970</guid>
		<description>okay...if ya'll got such a problem w/ the new ones...then keep yo janky old one and leave it alone...your reasons are about as irrelevent as...well i don't see anything in this world that irrelevant...it really aint nuthin to complain about...i could care less if  couldn't put "about" in my main menu...but i just keep yo 1st generation and go on bout you business....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay&#8230;if ya&#8217;ll got such a problem w/ the new ones&#8230;then keep yo janky old one and leave it alone&#8230;your reasons are about as irrelevent as&#8230;well i don&#8217;t see anything in this world that irrelevant&#8230;it really aint nuthin to complain about&#8230;i could care less if  couldn&#8217;t put &#8220;about&#8221; in my main menu&#8230;but i just keep yo 1st generation and go on bout you business&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exholt</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-110974</link>
		<dc:creator>exholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-110974</guid>
		<description>Stephan@ Post #41,

I never had a problem getting my 5G Ipod charged and synced using usb 1.1 on PCs or Macs(Beige G3).  Though usb 1.1 is SLOW for syncing, it charged my ipod just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephan@ Post #41,</p>
<p>I never had a problem getting my 5G Ipod charged and synced using usb 1.1 on PCs or Macs(Beige G3).  Though usb 1.1 is SLOW for syncing, it charged my ipod just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-108657</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-108657</guid>
		<description>It's not supported to use the iPod 5G with a USB 1.1 Mac, believe it I've tried numerous times. USB 1.1 does not supply enough power to the iPod.

Apple was still selling USB 1.1 based Macs in Summer 2003, two years later they introduced the iPod video 5G and removed Firewire support. A two year old Mac still supported by AppleCare (with another year of covered support left!) doesn't support the latest iPods and no upgrade path was offered from Apple.

This issue affected a lot of people, and I'm really surprised at how Apple handled the whole thing. Apple was one of the last vendors to ship all their computers with USB2, if not THE last.

Much love Firewire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not supported to use the iPod 5G with a USB 1.1 Mac, believe it I&#8217;ve tried numerous times. USB 1.1 does not supply enough power to the iPod.</p>
<p>Apple was still selling USB 1.1 based Macs in Summer 2003, two years later they introduced the iPod video 5G and removed Firewire support. A two year old Mac still supported by AppleCare (with another year of covered support left!) doesn&#8217;t support the latest iPods and no upgrade path was offered from Apple.</p>
<p>This issue affected a lot of people, and I&#8217;m really surprised at how Apple handled the whole thing. Apple was one of the last vendors to ship all their computers with USB2, if not THE last.</p>
<p>Much love Firewire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-05-20 &#187; paikia.com</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105695</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-05-20 &#187; paikia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105695</guid>
		<description>[...] Why new iPods aren’t quite as good as old iPods at The Apple Blog 第五代ipod不及第二代ipod?! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why new iPods aren’t quite as good as old iPods at The Apple Blog 第五代ipod不及第二代ipod?! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one of me &#187; the home of paul turnbull &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-05-08</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105327</link>
		<dc:creator>one of me &#187; the home of paul turnbull &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-05-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 23:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105327</guid>
		<description>[...]  Why new iPods aren’t quite as good as old iPods at The Apple Blog (tags: Commented IPod Apple) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Why new iPods aren’t quite as good as old iPods at The Apple Blog (tags: Commented IPod Apple) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105314</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 14:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105314</guid>
		<description>The biggest mistake was the removal of FireWire. But they did this because the chipset for it was too big to fit with everything else in the 5G iPod. Obviously Apple's focus on the iPod moved from Mac users to everyone (i.e PC users) so they thought - well all our new macs have USB 2.0 and all PCs have USB 2.0 whats the prob? Big big big mistake. FireWire is far superior to USB in speed and functionality.

Yea, that charger was pretty handy. I guess its all about those little things that please the user and make them think of you again next time their looking to buy something. "Oh I remember, that iPod was pretty good. Apple might have that thing I need this time..."

The other thing I wish Apple would have kept up was the reliability and sturdiness of their 2G iPods. You could hit that 2G iPod with a hammer and it would still be playing away its music happily. You drop a 3G and over iPod more than 5 - 10 cm above your desk? Gone. And as for bugs and resets and what not? I have never had to restore my iPod's software or even reset it with the button combo for the 5 or so years I've had the thing. But everyone I know who has a new iPod have some pretty big issues with this.

I think its probably just a combination of trying to push out more iPods to more users, which really means making the package cheaper and faster to produce and ship. That means less accessories and lesser quality production.  Apple is also interested in revenue and market share, if it doesn't cater for PC users it wont keep its place as No. 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest mistake was the removal of FireWire. But they did this because the chipset for it was too big to fit with everything else in the 5G iPod. Obviously Apple&#8217;s focus on the iPod moved from Mac users to everyone (i.e PC users) so they thought - well all our new macs have USB 2.0 and all PCs have USB 2.0 whats the prob? Big big big mistake. FireWire is far superior to USB in speed and functionality.</p>
<p>Yea, that charger was pretty handy. I guess its all about those little things that please the user and make them think of you again next time their looking to buy something. &#8220;Oh I remember, that iPod was pretty good. Apple might have that thing I need this time&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The other thing I wish Apple would have kept up was the reliability and sturdiness of their 2G iPods. You could hit that 2G iPod with a hammer and it would still be playing away its music happily. You drop a 3G and over iPod more than 5 - 10 cm above your desk? Gone. And as for bugs and resets and what not? I have never had to restore my iPod&#8217;s software or even reset it with the button combo for the 5 or so years I&#8217;ve had the thing. But everyone I know who has a new iPod have some pretty big issues with this.</p>
<p>I think its probably just a combination of trying to push out more iPods to more users, which really means making the package cheaper and faster to produce and ship. That means less accessories and lesser quality production.  Apple is also interested in revenue and market share, if it doesn&#8217;t cater for PC users it wont keep its place as No. 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Brunberg</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105307</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Brunberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 07:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105307</guid>
		<description>I miss the physical scroll wheel. Although the touch sensitive pad is nice and thinner I have always had problems using it: It's sporadic and not as predictable as the physical entity where 1 revolution always turns the same distance (adjusted for the logarithmic acceleration) in the interface. With the touch sensitive pad sometimes it will not always react on your finger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the physical scroll wheel. Although the touch sensitive pad is nice and thinner I have always had problems using it: It&#8217;s sporadic and not as predictable as the physical entity where 1 revolution always turns the same distance (adjusted for the logarithmic acceleration) in the interface. With the touch sensitive pad sometimes it will not always react on your finger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cooper</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105303</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105303</guid>
		<description>About is useless - get over it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About is useless - get over it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105302</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105302</guid>
		<description>Reply to #29, Eddie Hargraves:

I'll note my experience directly. I bought a 60G iPod Photo on Feb. 13, 2005 for CA$769.99. Within a week Apple had dropped the price to CA$609.99. The primary difference was the removal of the accessories. The difference for me was CA$160.00, which I'd call a substantial price drop. I will note this was at a time when Apple was exagerating the exchange rate. The current top end is CA$399 vs US$349.

Referencing the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod#Models" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia article&lt;/a&gt; it looks like you're accurate on the low end but not on the high. The low end has dropped from 399 (g1, 5GB) to 299 (g5,30GB), while the high end from 499 (g1,10GB) to 349 (g5,80GB). The price per gig on the top end has improved far more than on the low. (check out: &lt;a href="http://www.applematters.com/index.php/section/comments/how_much_cheaper_is_the_ipod_going_to_get/" rel="nofollow"&gt;How Much Cheaper Is the iPod Going to Get?&lt;/a&gt;)

That said I'd still rather not have Apple ship me anything other than the base device and let me decide what other bits I want. I have boxes of unused cables and bits that shipped with various bits of hardware I've bought over the years.

With regard to the iPod, every computer shipped in the last few years has USB 2.0, it's perfectly reasonable to standardize on that. As for the case that shipped with it, I don't know anybody who got one who used it. Same with the power adaptor, the majority of the users don't use it. When the majority don't use something it's perfectly reasonable to make it an add-on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to #29, Eddie Hargraves:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll note my experience directly. I bought a 60G iPod Photo on Feb. 13, 2005 for CA$769.99. Within a week Apple had dropped the price to CA$609.99. The primary difference was the removal of the accessories. The difference for me was CA$160.00, which I&#8217;d call a substantial price drop. I will note this was at a time when Apple was exagerating the exchange rate. The current top end is CA$399 vs US$349.</p>
<p>Referencing the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod#Models" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia article</a> it looks like you&#8217;re accurate on the low end but not on the high. The low end has dropped from 399 (g1, 5GB) to 299 (g5,30GB), while the high end from 499 (g1,10GB) to 349 (g5,80GB). The price per gig on the top end has improved far more than on the low. (check out: <a href="http://www.applematters.com/index.php/section/comments/how_much_cheaper_is_the_ipod_going_to_get/" rel="nofollow">How Much Cheaper Is the iPod Going to Get?</a>)</p>
<p>That said I&#8217;d still rather not have Apple ship me anything other than the base device and let me decide what other bits I want. I have boxes of unused cables and bits that shipped with various bits of hardware I&#8217;ve bought over the years.</p>
<p>With regard to the iPod, every computer shipped in the last few years has USB 2.0, it&#8217;s perfectly reasonable to standardize on that. As for the case that shipped with it, I don&#8217;t know anybody who got one who used it. Same with the power adaptor, the majority of the users don&#8217;t use it. When the majority don&#8217;t use something it&#8217;s perfectly reasonable to make it an add-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105301</guid>
		<description>PS: I forgot to mention they're free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: I forgot to mention they&#8217;re free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105300</guid>
		<description>You guys know that you can go to any Apple store and pick up some of the foam covers, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys know that you can go to any Apple store and pick up some of the foam covers, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105286</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105286</guid>
		<description>The click wheel in my opinion is the worst part of the newer ipods.. my first ipod with the buttons above the scroll wheel is way faster to find music and way easier to navigate with.. the click wheel just made it slower to scroll with and more touchy to  unwanted clicks that were not an issue with the previous design..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The click wheel in my opinion is the worst part of the newer ipods.. my first ipod with the buttons above the scroll wheel is way faster to find music and way easier to navigate with.. the click wheel just made it slower to scroll with and more touchy to  unwanted clicks that were not an issue with the previous design..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Liu</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105285</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105285</guid>
		<description>Apple doesn't include foam earbud covers because the new bundled headphones don't require them anymore since there's a ring of rubber that acts as a seal and an anti-ship along the edge of the headphones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple doesn&#8217;t include foam earbud covers because the new bundled headphones don&#8217;t require them anymore since there&#8217;s a ring of rubber that acts as a seal and an anti-ship along the edge of the headphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Hargreaves</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105284</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Hargreaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105284</guid>
		<description>Reply to #26, Paul Turnbull:

Introduced in July 2004, the 4G 20GB iPod cost $299 and included the FireWire cable.
Updated in June 2005, the 20GB iPod didn't include a FireWire cable and the price was ... $299. Neither of those included an AC adapter, which was included with the 3G models, which you could get for ... $299.

Substantial price drops, indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to #26, Paul Turnbull:</p>
<p>Introduced in July 2004, the 4G 20GB iPod cost $299 and included the FireWire cable.<br />
Updated in June 2005, the 20GB iPod didn&#8217;t include a FireWire cable and the price was &#8230; $299. Neither of those included an AC adapter, which was included with the 3G models, which you could get for &#8230; $299.</p>
<p>Substantial price drops, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105281</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105281</guid>
		<description>I like the clicker option. It is important to me as I do not look at the screen when I operate the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the clicker option. It is important to me as I do not look at the screen when I operate the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Treder</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105280</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Treder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105280</guid>
		<description>Good post, and excellent food for thought. It seems worthwhile with ALL things, whether music peripherals or Adobe Creative Suite software or washing machines, to document somewhere (the obvious place would be the ReadMe file) which features have been removed, discontinued, supplanted, or altered.

In fact, I would go a step further and ask why this isn't required of manufacturers. It's a small thing that could eradicate a lot of confusion in the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, and excellent food for thought. It seems worthwhile with ALL things, whether music peripherals or Adobe Creative Suite software or washing machines, to document somewhere (the obvious place would be the ReadMe file) which features have been removed, discontinued, supplanted, or altered.</p>
<p>In fact, I would go a step further and ask why this isn&#8217;t required of manufacturers. It&#8217;s a small thing that could eradicate a lot of confusion in the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105279</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105279</guid>
		<description>ASFAIK when the charger, extra cables, and case were removed the price was dropped substantially. I remember this because they did it right after I bought my 4G and price protection got me a good chunk of change back (and I got to keep the accoutrements). The math I did at the time said that I could buy all the missing bits for the difference in price.

As for the power adaptor, I have a 5G now and I rarely miss the adaptor. It has more than enough battery for a few days, at night it charges on my laptop and when I travel it's typically in my car with my FM transmittor/charger.

So by taking those things out Apple gave me the chance to spend the money on the add-ons I could use rather than the ones they thought I could use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASFAIK when the charger, extra cables, and case were removed the price was dropped substantially. I remember this because they did it right after I bought my 4G and price protection got me a good chunk of change back (and I got to keep the accoutrements). The math I did at the time said that I could buy all the missing bits for the difference in price.</p>
<p>As for the power adaptor, I have a 5G now and I rarely miss the adaptor. It has more than enough battery for a few days, at night it charges on my laptop and when I travel it&#8217;s typically in my car with my FM transmittor/charger.</p>
<p>So by taking those things out Apple gave me the chance to spend the money on the add-ons I could use rather than the ones they thought I could use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105277</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 21:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105277</guid>
		<description>I don't care about lack of Firewire. USB2 transfer speeds on my recently stolen video iPod :( vs Firewire speeds on my other iPods were all pretty much the same.

Nor do I worry about the lack of charger. Got plenty of those from the past.

What I do miss, is the "Hold Menu to toggle Backlight" option of the older iPods. The Video iPod doesnt have this feature. WTF? If I wanna go back to the top menu, I would be more than happy happy to press Menu 3 or 5 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about lack of Firewire. USB2 transfer speeds on my recently stolen video iPod <img src='http://theappleblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> vs Firewire speeds on my other iPods were all pretty much the same.</p>
<p>Nor do I worry about the lack of charger. Got plenty of those from the past.</p>
<p>What I do miss, is the &#8220;Hold Menu to toggle Backlight&#8221; option of the older iPods. The Video iPod doesnt have this feature. WTF? If I wanna go back to the top menu, I would be more than happy happy to press Menu 3 or 5 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Por que motivo os novos iPod não são tão bons com os anteriores &#171; Spinning beachball</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105220</link>
		<dc:creator>Por que motivo os novos iPod não são tão bons com os anteriores &#171; Spinning beachball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 13:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105220</guid>
		<description>[...] e a afastar-se do propósito inicial. O mote para este post tirei-o de uma análise efectuada pelo The Apple Blog sobre as diferenças (para pior) entre novos e velhos iPods. É certo que os novos trouxeram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e a afastar-se do propósito inicial. O mote para este post tirei-o de uma análise efectuada pelo The Apple Blog sobre as diferenças (para pior) entre novos e velhos iPods. É certo que os novos trouxeram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uli Kusterer</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105187</link>
		<dc:creator>Uli Kusterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105187</guid>
		<description>@rahrens: Well, I have booted my Intel Mini from various USB drives, and never had a problem. I think only PPC Macs ever had problems booting from USB, or maybe also one of the first Intel iMacs.

And BTW -- one cheap way to get an iPod charger is to buy a powered USB hub. Some of them are darn small, come with a power supply, and will provide power even when not attached to a Mac. And to boot, they cost about a 3rd less than Apple's charger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rahrens: Well, I have booted my Intel Mini from various USB drives, and never had a problem. I think only PPC Macs ever had problems booting from USB, or maybe also one of the first Intel iMacs.</p>
<p>And BTW &#8212; one cheap way to get an iPod charger is to buy a powered USB hub. Some of them are darn small, come with a power supply, and will provide power even when not attached to a Mac. And to boot, they cost about a 3rd less than Apple&#8217;s charger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105069</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105069</guid>
		<description>They're all pretty weak criticisms with the exception of the removal of the charger from the package, but that piece of penny pinching isn't part of the ipod itself anyway. And if your still using the headphones that came with the ipod, well nuff said. You should go out and buy a decent pair of sennheisers, bose or whatever. anything but the crap headphones that come with the ipod. And yes you can get them in white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re all pretty weak criticisms with the exception of the removal of the charger from the package, but that piece of penny pinching isn&#8217;t part of the ipod itself anyway. And if your still using the headphones that came with the ipod, well nuff said. You should go out and buy a decent pair of sennheisers, bose or whatever. anything but the crap headphones that come with the ipod. And yes you can get them in white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105052</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105052</guid>
		<description>Actually, the original iPod's home menu consisted of Playlists, ARTISTS, SONGS, Settings, and About. If you're going to nitpick about details as small as the omission of the About menu in the top menu in later models, at least get your facts right. Furthermore, 4G iPods did include FireWire cables in the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the original iPod&#8217;s home menu consisted of Playlists, ARTISTS, SONGS, Settings, and About. If you&#8217;re going to nitpick about details as small as the omission of the About menu in the top menu in later models, at least get your facts right. Furthermore, 4G iPods did include FireWire cables in the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rahrens</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105050</link>
		<dc:creator>rahrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105050</guid>
		<description>No, you can't boot from a USB drive at all, the USB bus doesn't become available until at some point later in the boot up process.  That's why you can in Firewire, it's available before OS X starts to load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you can&#8217;t boot from a USB drive at all, the USB bus doesn&#8217;t become available until at some point later in the boot up process.  That&#8217;s why you can in Firewire, it&#8217;s available before OS X starts to load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Earney</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105045</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Earney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105045</guid>
		<description>I think you &lt;b&gt;can&lt;/b&gt; boot an Intel mac from a USB iPod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you <b>can</b> boot an Intel mac from a USB iPod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Jobs</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105040</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 06:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105040</guid>
		<description>another 1 i miss: if you hold the menu button the lights would go on or off on my old ipod g4 but on my nano it doesnt:S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another 1 i miss: if you hold the menu button the lights would go on or off on my old ipod g4 but on my nano it doesnt:S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105037</link>
		<dc:creator>Galley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 04:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105037</guid>
		<description>The 4G 40GB B&#38;W iPods did one thing, and did it well.  It played music.  It also came with a bunch of accessories.  I almost regret selling mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 4G 40GB B&amp;W iPods did one thing, and did it well.  It played music.  It also came with a bunch of accessories.  I almost regret selling mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105035</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105035</guid>
		<description>My 3rd gen iPod is firewire, and I just love the wired remote. It had the dock, the power adapter. It was also quite expensive. I know my wifes 5G video cost less.
I would probably have bought another if it still supported firewire, as it is, I have one Mac that is only 3 years old and has USB 1.1 (eMac).  So it will have to wait.
After using the 5G video, my wife and I soon grew tired of the small video screen, so it is just used for music. Now I don't envy her as much and still enjoy my 3G. 
I prefer the touch sensitivity of the 3G and wish they would bring that back. It is annoying in the car when you push the clicker and the unit tips back in the dock.
The little black earpads always seemed silly to me. They just got stuck in your ear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 3rd gen iPod is firewire, and I just love the wired remote. It had the dock, the power adapter. It was also quite expensive. I know my wifes 5G video cost less.<br />
I would probably have bought another if it still supported firewire, as it is, I have one Mac that is only 3 years old and has USB 1.1 (eMac).  So it will have to wait.<br />
After using the 5G video, my wife and I soon grew tired of the small video screen, so it is just used for music. Now I don&#8217;t envy her as much and still enjoy my 3G.<br />
I prefer the touch sensitivity of the 3G and wish they would bring that back. It is annoying in the car when you push the clicker and the unit tips back in the dock.<br />
The little black earpads always seemed silly to me. They just got stuck in your ear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Likkie</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105033</link>
		<dc:creator>Likkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105033</guid>
		<description>I got 2 sets of foam earbud covers with my 80GB iPod 5.5G.

Maybe I got one of yours </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got 2 sets of foam earbud covers with my 80GB iPod 5.5G.</p>
<p>Maybe I got one of yours</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emory Dunn</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105029</link>
		<dc:creator>Emory Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105029</guid>
		<description>I was rather surprised when you talked about the clicker option, I just checked my 2G Nano, and I can change the clicker between headphones, speaker, both, and off. Just like I could with my 1G Mini, and on every other iPod I have used.

And while your ranting and raving about removed features, you should talk about all of the ADDED features, such as volume limit and multiple clocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was rather surprised when you talked about the clicker option, I just checked my 2G Nano, and I can change the clicker between headphones, speaker, both, and off. Just like I could with my 1G Mini, and on every other iPod I have used.</p>
<p>And while your ranting and raving about removed features, you should talk about all of the ADDED features, such as volume limit and multiple clocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ad6am</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105027</link>
		<dc:creator>ad6am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/04/30/why-new-ipods-arent-quite-as-good-as-old-ipods/#comment-105027</guid>
		<description>One other thing that went away at some point, most likely with a software update: having your iPod's sleep timer on by default. 

I set my 3G iPod to always auto-sleep after 60 minutes, and having to turn it back on (and thus knowing every morning how much longer 'til my train arrived at Grand Central Station) was a small price to pay for the guarantee that I'd never be surprised by an empty battery. 

Now I have to go into the clock settings each time to get the same effect.

But of course, not knowing why this was seemingly unnecessary change was enacted is even more frustrating than the change itself.

ad6am</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing that went away at some point, most likely with a software update: having your iPod&#8217;s sleep timer on by default. </p>
<p>I set my 3G iPod to always auto-sleep after 60 minutes, and having to turn it back on (and thus knowing every morning how much longer &#8217;til my train arrived at Grand Central Station) was a small price to pay for the guarantee that I&#8217;d never be surprised by an empty battery. </p>
<p>Now I have to go into the clock settings each time to get the same effect.</p>
<p>But of course, not knowing why this was seemingly unnecessary change was enacted is even more frustrating than the change itself.</p>
<p>ad6am</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
