<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really? ThinkSecret writing for PC Mag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Houghton</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105556</guid>
		<description>I think most people will agree that ThinkSecret today is a mere shadow of its former self, however I don't know if it's necessary to slam them like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most people will agree that ThinkSecret today is a mere shadow of its former self, however I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s necessary to slam them like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Tawes</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105514</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Tawes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105514</guid>
		<description>Is this going to be like how Fox tries to pass off what it says as "News" or "Facts"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this going to be like how Fox tries to pass off what it says as &#8220;News&#8221; or &#8220;Facts&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105467</guid>
		<description>Not that I have any love for PC Mag or ThinkSecret, but here's the thing...

YOU READ THE ARTICLE!

That's what they wanted from you. And you will continue to read the articles, if for no other reason than to see how stupid it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I have any love for PC Mag or ThinkSecret, but here&#8217;s the thing&#8230;</p>
<p>YOU READ THE ARTICLE!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what they wanted from you. And you will continue to read the articles, if for no other reason than to see how stupid it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105458</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 08:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105458</guid>
		<description>Well said. These rabit out of the hat 'rumours' just set people up for disappointment and must really get on Apple's nerves. I'm not ass-kissing but I much prefer the open speculation on the Apple Blog which freely discusses posibilities of what we could see rather than picking a date, saying it's coming and then taking all the credit when 1 out of 10 'rumours' turn out to be right (typically a rumour along the lines of "faster processors coming soon" - duh?!?!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. These rabit out of the hat &#8216;rumours&#8217; just set people up for disappointment and must really get on Apple&#8217;s nerves. I&#8217;m not ass-kissing but I much prefer the open speculation on the Apple Blog which freely discusses posibilities of what we could see rather than picking a date, saying it&#8217;s coming and then taking all the credit when 1 out of 10 &#8216;rumours&#8217; turn out to be right (typically a rumour along the lines of &#8220;faster processors coming soon&#8221; - duh?!?!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105451</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105451</guid>
		<description>Guess what just hit me? I could start my own top secret Apple blog. Come on Sparky! Pick a ticket for today's rumor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what just hit me? I could start my own top secret Apple blog. Come on Sparky! Pick a ticket for today&#8217;s rumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105450</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105450</guid>
		<description>Probably gonna remove ThinkSecret from my RSS feeds. The Apple Blog is getting better and better. I remember a time when it was something around 1 post per day or so, but now it's better.

ThinkSecret should come up with some rumors that are more plausible and actually happen at the date specified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably gonna remove ThinkSecret from my RSS feeds. The Apple Blog is getting better and better. I remember a time when it was something around 1 post per day or so, but now it&#8217;s better.</p>
<p>ThinkSecret should come up with some rumors that are more plausible and actually happen at the date specified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not me</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105449</link>
		<dc:creator>Not me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105449</guid>
		<description>Lame, you failed to mention the times "they" had it right. Convenient I guess. I fail to see what appeal this has for your readers. For me, a rant about a RUMOR site is a waste of space and time. Then again Im writing this and wasting even more of it by letting you know. Well, time to waste it somewhere else...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame, you failed to mention the times &#8220;they&#8221; had it right. Convenient I guess. I fail to see what appeal this has for your readers. For me, a rant about a RUMOR site is a waste of space and time. Then again Im writing this and wasting even more of it by letting you know. Well, time to waste it somewhere else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Churry</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105448</link>
		<dc:creator>Churry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 03:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/13/really-thinksecret-writing-for-pc-mag/#comment-105448</guid>
		<description>Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
