<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get VMware Fusion for&#160;$39</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/</link>
	<description>The Apple Blog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mac Law Students &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $39 for VMware Fusion</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-107253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Law Students &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $39 for VMware Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-107253</guid>
		<description>[...] VMware&#8217;s answer to Parallels won&#8217;t be shipping until August or later, but you can get a nice deal on it if you pre-order. The normally $79 virtualization software is available at $39 for a limited time for early adopters of their 1.0 release. Tip o&#8217; the hat to The Apple Blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VMware&#8217;s answer to Parallels won&#8217;t be shipping until August or later, but you can get a nice deal on it if you pre-order. The normally $79 virtualization software is available at $39 for a limited time for early adopters of their 1.0 release. Tip o&#8217; the hat to The Apple Blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adin</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106275</link>
		<dc:creator>adin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106275</guid>
		<description>are they planning on supporting aero in V1.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are they planning on supporting aero in V1.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VK Sefirosu</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106261</link>
		<dc:creator>VK Sefirosu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106261</guid>
		<description>http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=88195&#38;tstart=0

This should help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=88195&amp;tstart=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=88195&amp;tstart=0</a></p>
<p>This should help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106253</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106253</guid>
		<description>good call there tycho; in fact, i followed an out of date "conversion" process for parallels xp vm install to a fusion one and it was a total failure. i really wanted to try out the fusion betas, but i don't want to go through the hassle of getting my copy of xp re-registered/verified through ms and also to have to resetup my visual studio dev. environment. bottom line, fusion looks awesome, but until i can convert or just USE my parallels xp install in fusion, i won't get around to trying it out anytime soon. 'sides i just dropped a few more bones on v3 of parallels after buying their initial offering earlier this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good call there tycho; in fact, i followed an out of date &#8220;conversion&#8221; process for parallels xp vm install to a fusion one and it was a total failure. i really wanted to try out the fusion betas, but i don&#8217;t want to go through the hassle of getting my copy of xp re-registered/verified through ms and also to have to resetup my visual studio dev. environment. bottom line, fusion looks awesome, but until i can convert or just USE my parallels xp install in fusion, i won&#8217;t get around to trying it out anytime soon. &#8217;sides i just dropped a few more bones on v3 of parallels after buying their initial offering earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tycho</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106245</link>
		<dc:creator>tycho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-106245</guid>
		<description>And yes, what we've seen on the web is pretty impressive.  But for those of us that have Parallels installed already, the inability to utilise Parallels' XP installation makes for a tedious crossgrade...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, what we&#8217;ve seen on the web is pretty impressive.  But for those of us that have Parallels installed already, the inability to utilise Parallels&#8217; XP installation makes for a tedious crossgrade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
