<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Knocks $100 Off Refurb iPhones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17767</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17767</guid>
		<description>Nick, thanks for making the change.
-
You seriously don&#039;t think that the original headline implied that the price of the iPhone - no qualifier - had been lowered by $100? Without a qualifier, the implication is &quot;new&quot; - not &quot;refurb&quot;. Something like &quot;Get an iPhone for $400&quot; would have been just as traffic-worthy but less misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, thanks for making the change.<br />
-<br />
You seriously don&#8217;t think that the original headline implied that the price of the iPhone &#8211; no qualifier &#8211; had been lowered by $100? Without a qualifier, the implication is &#8220;new&#8221; &#8211; not &#8220;refurb&#8221;. Something like &#8220;Get an iPhone for $400&#8243; would have been just as traffic-worthy but less misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacRat</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17766</link>
		<dc:creator>MacRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17766</guid>
		<description>I agree. Very misleading. Apple offering discounts on refurb items is pretty standard. I&#039;m not sure why various blogs are trying to hype the iPhone refurbs as something special or out of the ordinary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Very misleading. Apple offering discounts on refurb items is pretty standard. I&#8217;m not sure why various blogs are trying to hype the iPhone refurbs as something special or out of the ordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Santilli</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17768</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Santilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17768</guid>
		<description>Um, but it&#039;s true.  anyway, changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, but it&#8217;s true.  anyway, changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17769</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/21/apple-knocks-100-off-iphone/#comment-17769</guid>
		<description>This headline is misleading and annoying. Please correct it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This headline is misleading and annoying. Please correct it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
