<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xslimmer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Levine</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-124363</link>
		<dc:creator>James Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-124363</guid>
		<description>What I'm getting from this discourse is that more is not nec. better. The developer here took a lot of care to identify code that was extraneous. On the other end of your options is monolingual, which in the past has forced me to commit to a complete clean system re-install. The difference is like a scalpel and an axe, if you want to borrow a metaphor from the campaign trail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m getting from this discourse is that more is not nec. better. The developer here took a lot of care to identify code that was extraneous. On the other end of your options is monolingual, which in the past has forced me to commit to a complete clean system re-install. The difference is like a scalpel and an axe, if you want to borrow a metaphor from the campaign trail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slimmer Snow Leopard? &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-118073</link>
		<dc:creator>Slimmer Snow Leopard? &#124; The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-118073</guid>
		<description>[...] loss of size is dramatic, it&#8217;s actually less of a reduction than I can get by running running XSlimmer - to use Mail as an example, the xslimmed Mail weighs in at a svelte 24.7 MB - significantly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loss of size is dramatic, it&#8217;s actually less of a reduction than I can get by running running XSlimmer - to use Mail as an example, the xslimmed Mail weighs in at a svelte 24.7 MB - significantly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: XSlimmer -</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-118029</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: XSlimmer -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-118029</guid>
		<description>[...] a more technical and in depth review at TheAppleBlog                Tags: Apple, Review, Technology    You can follow any responses to this entry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a more technical and in depth review at TheAppleBlog                Tags: Apple, Review, Technology    You can follow any responses to this entry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mildm8nnered</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112519</link>
		<dc:creator>mildm8nnered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112519</guid>
		<description>If you're struggling with disk space, you might also want to check out Baseline - a disk scanning app that lets you track changes on your hard disk, as well as telling you how much space each item is taking up (I am the author with Baseline).

http://www.mildmanneredindustries.com/baseline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re struggling with disk space, you might also want to check out Baseline - a disk scanning app that lets you track changes on your hard disk, as well as telling you how much space each item is taking up (I am the author with Baseline).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mildmanneredindustries.com/baseline" rel="nofollow">http://www.mildmanneredindustries.com/baseline</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amigão do Disco Rígido &#124; Chupa essa manga</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112489</link>
		<dc:creator>Amigão do Disco Rígido &#124; Chupa essa manga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112489</guid>
		<description>[...] Mais informações, aqui. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mais informações, aqui. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112486</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112486</guid>
		<description>It is better because it does more than Xslimmer. It also compresses images and removes debug information. From my experience, it cleard a MB or so more in an app than Xslimmer. It isn't much, I agree with that.

Remeber it's free.

What I like in Xslimmer and miss in Trimmit is the better interface and the wizard for finding/slimming more apps at the same time.

Trimmit is still beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is better because it does more than Xslimmer. It also compresses images and removes debug information. From my experience, it cleard a MB or so more in an app than Xslimmer. It isn&#8217;t much, I agree with that.</p>
<p>Remeber it&#8217;s free.</p>
<p>What I like in Xslimmer and miss in Trimmit is the better interface and the wizard for finding/slimming more apps at the same time.</p>
<p>Trimmit is still beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112453</guid>
		<description>#14. Is that based on your experience, an educated guess, or simply an opinion with no foundation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14. Is that based on your experience, an educated guess, or simply an opinion with no foundation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112449</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112449</guid>
		<description>As Nick and Harley said, Trimmit is way better and it's free. Only problem you might find with it is that it lacks multiple slimming on a GUI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Nick and Harley said, Trimmit is way better and it&#8217;s free. Only problem you might find with it is that it lacks multiple slimming on a GUI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harley</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112445</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112445</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Trimmit's free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Trimmit&#8217;s free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harley</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112444</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112444</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Overall, Xslimmer is extremely intuitive and kind of fun to use, especially when you see some of the notable savings&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I've found that Vacuous Virtuoso's &lt;a href="http://lipidity.com/software/trimmit/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trimmit&lt;/a&gt; does a much better job at removing bloat and recovering disk space. It also has a 100% failsafe backup system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Overall, Xslimmer is extremely intuitive and kind of fun to use, especially when you see some of the notable savings</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that Vacuous Virtuoso&#8217;s <a href="http://lipidity.com/software/trimmit/" rel="nofollow">Trimmit</a> does a much better job at removing bloat and recovering disk space. It also has a 100% failsafe backup system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112440</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112440</guid>
		<description>"Sorry to hear that folks have had issues with programs like this."

Sure. I notice the guy now says:

"I use both Power PC and Intel Macs and this caused issues as well when copying apps."

Of course, if that's if that's your use-profile you don't want to be stripping out architectures. Those who don't need to move application bundles between machines with different architectures should be fine. Not "will be" but "should be" ... there are exceptions. And do stay within limits. The same poster also mentions Monolingual, and says he doesn't know if it was that that caused the problem. Possibly it was: on the Monolingual site they note:

"... you should not strip the System frameworks [on an Intel Mac] if you want to use Rosetta."

http://monolingual.sourceforge.net/faq.php

Quite so. Microsoft Office would, of course, be using Rosetta.

And as has been said, there are apps that don't like having stuff removed. Adobe has already been mentioned. One suspects there could be issues with Skype, as that is known to check its integrity on launch (hence its problem with the Leopard firewall). I've also noticed that Pacifist will complain if it thinks it's been corrupted, as it might do when being cleaned.

Bottom line: as Matt advised, make sure you have backups.

But there's nothing wrong in itself with slimming down application bundles. It's not second-guessing Apple. Apple itself makes a widget in the GUI available for removing languages. (See "Languages" on any application bundles "Get Info" panel -- removing unwanted languages is what the "minus" sign is there for.) These apps merely automate the process.

And lipo is there on the command line, made available by Apple themselves, specifically for removing architectures.

http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/lipo.1.html

Applications like Monolingual, one imagines, remove architectures by making use of lipo.

I'd suggest this blog might also like to take a look at Ankur Kothari's Trimmit:

http://lipidity.com/downloads/

Trimmit has a few other tricks up its sleeve. It looks for redundant files that are put there in the build process but are not supposed to be distributed. It checks whether a developer has used a "debug" build -- again developers are not *supposed* to distribute debug builds but some are lazy enough, or uniformed enough, to do so. Trimmit can also apply lossless compression to tiff files. Mac apps tend to have a lot of tiffs in, and although Apple provides a utility at the command line for compressing tiffs not all developers use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sorry to hear that folks have had issues with programs like this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure. I notice the guy now says:</p>
<p>&#8220;I use both Power PC and Intel Macs and this caused issues as well when copying apps.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, if that&#8217;s if that&#8217;s your use-profile you don&#8217;t want to be stripping out architectures. Those who don&#8217;t need to move application bundles between machines with different architectures should be fine. Not &#8220;will be&#8221; but &#8220;should be&#8221; &#8230; there are exceptions. And do stay within limits. The same poster also mentions Monolingual, and says he doesn&#8217;t know if it was that that caused the problem. Possibly it was: on the Monolingual site they note:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; you should not strip the System frameworks [on an Intel Mac] if you want to use Rosetta.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://monolingual.sourceforge.net/faq.php" rel="nofollow">http://monolingual.sourceforge.net/faq.php</a></p>
<p>Quite so. Microsoft Office would, of course, be using Rosetta.</p>
<p>And as has been said, there are apps that don&#8217;t like having stuff removed. Adobe has already been mentioned. One suspects there could be issues with Skype, as that is known to check its integrity on launch (hence its problem with the Leopard firewall). I&#8217;ve also noticed that Pacifist will complain if it thinks it&#8217;s been corrupted, as it might do when being cleaned.</p>
<p>Bottom line: as Matt advised, make sure you have backups.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s nothing wrong in itself with slimming down application bundles. It&#8217;s not second-guessing Apple. Apple itself makes a widget in the GUI available for removing languages. (See &#8220;Languages&#8221; on any application bundles &#8220;Get Info&#8221; panel &#8212; removing unwanted languages is what the &#8220;minus&#8221; sign is there for.) These apps merely automate the process.</p>
<p>And lipo is there on the command line, made available by Apple themselves, specifically for removing architectures.</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/lipo.1.html" rel="nofollow">http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/lipo.1.html</a></p>
<p>Applications like Monolingual, one imagines, remove architectures by making use of lipo.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest this blog might also like to take a look at Ankur Kothari&#8217;s Trimmit:</p>
<p><a href="http://lipidity.com/downloads/" rel="nofollow">http://lipidity.com/downloads/</a></p>
<p>Trimmit has a few other tricks up its sleeve. It looks for redundant files that are put there in the build process but are not supposed to be distributed. It checks whether a developer has used a &#8220;debug&#8221; build &#8212; again developers are not *supposed* to distribute debug builds but some are lazy enough, or uniformed enough, to do so. Trimmit can also apply lossless compression to tiff files. Mac apps tend to have a lot of tiffs in, and although Apple provides a utility at the command line for compressing tiffs not all developers use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Guertin</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112438</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Guertin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112438</guid>
		<description>I love XSlimmer - I try out tons of apps, and XSlimmer saves me a ton of space, both before in Tiger and now in Leopard.
Also, FYI, the reason you can't slim Adobe apps IS an Adobe thing - if you modify their code in any way, the software won't run.  Given other decisions the company has made, I suspect it's an attempt to prevent piracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love XSlimmer - I try out tons of apps, and XSlimmer saves me a ton of space, both before in Tiger and now in Leopard.<br />
Also, FYI, the reason you can&#8217;t slim Adobe apps IS an Adobe thing - if you modify their code in any way, the software won&#8217;t run.  Given other decisions the company has made, I suspect it&#8217;s an attempt to prevent piracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112424</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112424</guid>
		<description>Nice app. It has never given me a problem either, and the risk is really limited. At maximum you would have to restore or reinstall an application. 

It has saved me 4Gb in my Macbook. I am really happy with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice app. It has never given me a problem either, and the risk is really limited. At maximum you would have to restore or reinstall an application. </p>
<p>It has saved me 4Gb in my Macbook. I am really happy with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Radel</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112422</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Radel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112422</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear that folks have had issues with programs like this. As I said, I've had no issues since slimming my apps, and the backup system seems to be extremely sound. 

I'll keep tabs on everything and post any updates if necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that folks have had issues with programs like this. As I said, I&#8217;ve had no issues since slimming my apps, and the backup system seems to be extremely sound. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep tabs on everything and post any updates if necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.photoigor.com - Igor&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Вы выходите? Нет? Освободите место</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112421</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.photoigor.com - Igor&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Вы выходите? Нет? Освободите место</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112421</guid>
		<description>[...] наводке The Apple Blog я загрузил Xslimmer и оплатил лицензию (всего-то $11.95, зато [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] наводке The Apple Blog я загрузил Xslimmer и оплатил лицензию (всего-то $11.95, зато [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Orchant</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112420</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Orchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112420</guid>
		<description>Steiner - let us know if you have better results with the current version (I suspect you will).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steiner - let us know if you have better results with the current version (I suspect you will).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steiner</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112419</link>
		<dc:creator>steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112419</guid>
		<description>Yes I used an earlier version of Xslimmer and another app called monolingual, I had back ups although the additional time and initial frustration was horrid. 

I use both Power PC and Intel Macs and this caused issues as well when copying apps. 

I downloaded this version of Xslimmer and it seems to have gained some good features and improvements under the hood.

I think my advise should be modified to make a complete back up and remove only those items you surely do not need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I used an earlier version of Xslimmer and another app called monolingual, I had back ups although the additional time and initial frustration was horrid. </p>
<p>I use both Power PC and Intel Macs and this caused issues as well when copying apps. </p>
<p>I downloaded this version of Xslimmer and it seems to have gained some good features and improvements under the hood.</p>
<p>I think my advise should be modified to make a complete back up and remove only those items you surely do not need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Orchant</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112418</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Orchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112418</guid>
		<description>Like Ingo (#3), I have used XSlimmer on a number of systems running both Tiger and Leopard with zero problems. I have hundreds of applications installed (I do a lot of reviews) and have never, not once, had an application fail due to slimming. In aggregate on my two current Macs (both running Leopard BTW) I have saved over 4GB of disk space.

To steiner (#2) - it's not a question of whether or not "Apple knows what it's doing". The reason these apps can be slimmed in inherent to the Universal Binary format introduced to support both Power PC and Intel Macs. There's lot of extra code being installed on both types of systems that's never used. Great for developers who want to support a wide base of users with both old and new hardware. In no way useful to end users once the application is installed. And I beg to differ. Saving 2GB of space on a 120GB hard drive is not inconsequential.

I've slimmed MS Office on four different systems with no issues. Not sure what languages you nuked that caused your problem and I'd be curious if you did that some time ago with an older version (Xslimmer is updated frequently and better sensitivity to language components was a fix a while back) and more importantly, whether you followed Matt's very good advice to use the Backup feature so you could easily restore, rather than having to reinstall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Ingo (#3), I have used XSlimmer on a number of systems running both Tiger and Leopard with zero problems. I have hundreds of applications installed (I do a lot of reviews) and have never, not once, had an application fail due to slimming. In aggregate on my two current Macs (both running Leopard BTW) I have saved over 4GB of disk space.</p>
<p>To steiner (#2) - it&#8217;s not a question of whether or not &#8220;Apple knows what it&#8217;s doing&#8221;. The reason these apps can be slimmed in inherent to the Universal Binary format introduced to support both Power PC and Intel Macs. There&#8217;s lot of extra code being installed on both types of systems that&#8217;s never used. Great for developers who want to support a wide base of users with both old and new hardware. In no way useful to end users once the application is installed. And I beg to differ. Saving 2GB of space on a 120GB hard drive is not inconsequential.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve slimmed MS Office on four different systems with no issues. Not sure what languages you nuked that caused your problem and I&#8217;d be curious if you did that some time ago with an older version (Xslimmer is updated frequently and better sensitivity to language components was a fix a while back) and more importantly, whether you followed Matt&#8217;s very good advice to use the Backup feature so you could easily restore, rather than having to reinstall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112417</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112417</guid>
		<description>FYI :

&lt;blockquote cite="http://lipidity.com/apple/cleaning-apps-mac-os-x/"&gt;Xslimmer (ironically) is over 80% junk, going from 5 MB on disk to a meagre 1 MB after being cleaned. In this case, the disk image is three times as big as the cleaned, uncompressed app.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI :</p>
<blockquote cite="http://lipidity.com/apple/cleaning-apps-mac-os-x/"><p>Xslimmer (ironically) is over 80% junk, going from 5 MB on disk to a meagre 1 MB after being cleaned. In this case, the disk image is three times as big as the cleaned, uncompressed app.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112413</guid>
		<description>I've been using Xslimmer on Tiger and Leopard and never encountered any problems. Great program and well wort the $$$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Xslimmer on Tiger and Leopard and never encountered any problems. Great program and well wort the $$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steiner</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112410</link>
		<dc:creator>steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112410</guid>
		<description>This is potentially dangerous, I ran it while on TIger and it removed language packs that were needed in Office 2004 and it never worked thereafter. I had to do a complete reinstall. 

Be careful if this program removes architectures in any way in Leopard, this will ruin your system for sure and could brick your system. This is due to signed applications and the sandboxing and security features in leopard. 

I am staying away from all these slimming pgms.

Apple knows what they are doing, most hard drives are fast enough and for the 200MB of space rather delete or move some of those old ripped movies that you are not watching any more. Or stip iTunes of half the library that you are not listening to anyways.

well that is my 2c, basically stay away from this app and others like it or it will cost you not only the license but a new system and at worst new hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is potentially dangerous, I ran it while on TIger and it removed language packs that were needed in Office 2004 and it never worked thereafter. I had to do a complete reinstall. </p>
<p>Be careful if this program removes architectures in any way in Leopard, this will ruin your system for sure and could brick your system. This is due to signed applications and the sandboxing and security features in leopard. </p>
<p>I am staying away from all these slimming pgms.</p>
<p>Apple knows what they are doing, most hard drives are fast enough and for the 200MB of space rather delete or move some of those old ripped movies that you are not watching any more. Or stip iTunes of half the library that you are not listening to anyways.</p>
<p>well that is my 2c, basically stay away from this app and others like it or it will cost you not only the license but a new system and at worst new hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slevin</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112407</link>
		<dc:creator>Slevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/28/review-xslimmer/#comment-112407</guid>
		<description>The reader should be aware that in Leopard applications will be digitally signed so if they are altered they may not run properly. I only changed my icon for safari and I constantly got an error message telling me to reinstall safari so I'm not sure what removing the architecture would do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reader should be aware that in Leopard applications will be digitally signed so if they are altered they may not run properly. I only changed my icon for safari and I constantly got an error message telling me to reinstall safari so I&#8217;m not sure what removing the architecture would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
