<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta Rocks Aqua On Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-127323</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-127323</guid>
		<description>For scripting, OOo has command line tools + macros.  If you want to do something in AppleScript, you can always find the binary "soffice" inside the package, use the terminal sudo ln -s "path-to-soffice" "/usr/bin", and then invoke Open Office in Applescript by do shell script "soffice -invisible ..." and run any soffice macro invisibly by Applescript.  Kind of a roundabout way of doing it, but better than GUI scripting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For scripting, OOo has command line tools + macros.  If you want to do something in AppleScript, you can always find the binary &#8220;soffice&#8221; inside the package, use the terminal sudo ln -s &#8220;path-to-soffice&#8221; &#8220;/usr/bin&#8221;, and then invoke Open Office in Applescript by do shell script &#8220;soffice -invisible &#8230;&#8221; and run any soffice macro invisibly by Applescript.  Kind of a roundabout way of doing it, but better than GUI scripting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Folle Rec</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-121840</link>
		<dc:creator>Folle Rec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-121840</guid>
		<description>I'm a long time NeoOffice user (since 1.0 up to current). I've downloaded OOo 3.0 Final and the two most obvious things I've noticed upon 15 minutes of opening up several of my daily working files are:

1. Arial 10 is bigger in OOo than in NeoOffice.
2. OOo is faster to load. I mean really fast. On a MacBook mid-2008 model.

That's the the first impression. The font thing seems really strange to me as opening up the same document in both makes it look different. I'll have to experiment some more if it really is different or just my eyes playing tricks on me. Looks are important if you work with the same document everyday (my personal password-protected financial file) and whenever I create forms for the office. They have to be exact so that if anyone else modifies a form, it doesn't turn from a 1-page form into a 1-page + 1 line form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a long time NeoOffice user (since 1.0 up to current). I&#8217;ve downloaded OOo 3.0 Final and the two most obvious things I&#8217;ve noticed upon 15 minutes of opening up several of my daily working files are:</p>
<p>1. Arial 10 is bigger in OOo than in NeoOffice.<br />
2. OOo is faster to load. I mean really fast. On a MacBook mid-2008 model.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the the first impression. The font thing seems really strange to me as opening up the same document in both makes it look different. I&#8217;ll have to experiment some more if it really is different or just my eyes playing tricks on me. Looks are important if you work with the same document everyday (my personal password-protected financial file) and whenever I create forms for the office. They have to be exact so that if anyone else modifies a form, it doesn&#8217;t turn from a 1-page form into a 1-page + 1 line form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-120222</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-120222</guid>
		<description>Have they managed to *finally* keep absolute references is a formula from being broken?  If a cell contains the formula '=$A$1+C1+D1' and I click on the formula and drag the $a$1 reference with my mouse to, say, B1, the formula now reads '=$B$1:B1+c1+d1' instead of '=$B$1+C1+D1' as it should be.  Has this been fixed in 3.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have they managed to *finally* keep absolute references is a formula from being broken?  If a cell contains the formula &#8216;=$A$1+C1+D1&#8242; and I click on the formula and drag the $a$1 reference with my mouse to, say, B1, the formula now reads &#8216;=$B$1:B1+c1+d1&#8242; instead of &#8216;=$B$1+C1+D1&#8242; as it should be.  Has this been fixed in 3.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Moore</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-118269</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-118269</guid>
		<description>If you want individual launchers for the different parts of OpenOffice.org, I created some you can download here: 

http://stuporglue.org/openoffice.org-aqua-launchers.php

These are separate launchers for Calc, Write, Impress, etc.

There is another download on the same page for command line launchers like on Linux (oocalc, oowrite, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want individual launchers for the different parts of OpenOffice.org, I created some you can download here: </p>
<p><a href="http://stuporglue.org/openoffice.org-aqua-launchers.php" rel="nofollow">http://stuporglue.org/openoffice.org-aqua-launchers.php</a></p>
<p>These are separate launchers for Calc, Write, Impress, etc.</p>
<p>There is another download on the same page for command line launchers like on Linux (oocalc, oowrite, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116925</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116925</guid>
		<description>What a find -- a recipe application.  I have an old recipe/cookbook app that I did in VB6 sometime ago.  We are thinking about re-doing in in Java so it is easily cross-platform (not that Java is the only way to do this), or use OOv3.  I could use some insight as I have not had the time to experiment with OOv3.  
1. Did you need to do a relational design to list all of the ingredients?  Normally the recipe would have a file number to be used as an idex for the ingredients as well as any other lists.
2. If a relational database was not used, how would one do something like this:
Amount    Item           Note
1 Cup     Apples, tart   Peeled, cored, cut to 1/2-inch pcs.
1 Cup     rhubarb, fresh sliced 1/2-inch pcs.

Thanks, 
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a find &#8212; a recipe application.  I have an old recipe/cookbook app that I did in VB6 sometime ago.  We are thinking about re-doing in in Java so it is easily cross-platform (not that Java is the only way to do this), or use OOv3.  I could use some insight as I have not had the time to experiment with OOv3.<br />
1. Did you need to do a relational design to list all of the ingredients?  Normally the recipe would have a file number to be used as an idex for the ingredients as well as any other lists.<br />
2. If a relational database was not used, how would one do something like this:<br />
Amount    Item           Note<br />
1 Cup     Apples, tart   Peeled, cored, cut to 1/2-inch pcs.<br />
1 Cup     rhubarb, fresh sliced 1/2-inch pcs.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolidOffice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More OOo 3.0 Mac Reviews</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116923</link>
		<dc:creator>SolidOffice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More OOo 3.0 Mac Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116923</guid>
		<description>[...] One: Reviewed on The Apple Blog: &#8220;The first noticeable item is how quickly OpenOffice 3.0 beta loads, even when compared with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One: Reviewed on The Apple Blog: &#8220;The first noticeable item is how quickly OpenOffice 3.0 beta loads, even when compared with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millions</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116684</link>
		<dc:creator>millions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116684</guid>
		<description>I'm curious how it compares to NeoOffice too.  I get a weekly excel sheet that doesn't import into NeoOffice and I'd heard it was a bug in the openoffice software.  It works in Numbers, but Numbers doesn't import all the shading.  It'd be nice to find one application that will import Microsoft Office files without changing formatting or anything else.  THAT would be an application worth having.  

It's hard to write a resume or paper on pages or NeoOffice and wonder if it's going to look screwed up for the person who opens it with Word on a pc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious how it compares to NeoOffice too.  I get a weekly excel sheet that doesn&#8217;t import into NeoOffice and I&#8217;d heard it was a bug in the openoffice software.  It works in Numbers, but Numbers doesn&#8217;t import all the shading.  It&#8217;d be nice to find one application that will import Microsoft Office files without changing formatting or anything else.  THAT would be an application worth having.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to write a resume or paper on pages or NeoOffice and wonder if it&#8217;s going to look screwed up for the person who opens it with Word on a pc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116662</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116662</guid>
		<description>You must be kidding? Rocks Aqua? :P You guys should wait until version 4 is released. That one will respect the Apple Interface Guidelines.

This one sucks (in terms of looks). I mean yes, it's progress and I appreciate that. It's great. But as a Mac user who likes to see real Mac apps, this just looks like a bad port.

I can't wait for version 4 :)

I do wish to congratulate them on porting all the code to something Mac OS native.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be kidding? Rocks Aqua? <img src='http://theappleblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> You guys should wait until version 4 is released. That one will respect the Apple Interface Guidelines.</p>
<p>This one sucks (in terms of looks). I mean yes, it&#8217;s progress and I appreciate that. It&#8217;s great. But as a Mac user who likes to see real Mac apps, this just looks like a bad port.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for version 4 <img src='http://theappleblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I do wish to congratulate them on porting all the code to something Mac OS native.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office Alternatives for Mac &#124; Rick Tech</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116660</link>
		<dc:creator>Office Alternatives for Mac &#124; Rick Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116660</guid>
		<description>[...] to beat. While Neo Office was forked from Open Office quite some time ago, they are still only in beta support for OS X, so it&#8217;s best to remain with Neo Office for quite some time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to beat. While Neo Office was forked from Open Office quite some time ago, they are still only in beta support for OS X, so it&#8217;s best to remain with Neo Office for quite some time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bow</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116641</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116641</guid>
		<description>What I'd be interested in hearing is your impressions of Open Office 3.0 compared to NeoOffice, since these two branches of the same basic program are now in competition with each other. 

I've tested the two together, and noticed that OOO was a little quicker on the opening, but NeoOffice seemed to consume less RAM. Also, I can switch between documents with the option-tilde in NeoOffice, and I can't do that in OpenOffice, which is a little annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;d be interested in hearing is your impressions of Open Office 3.0 compared to NeoOffice, since these two branches of the same basic program are now in competition with each other. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tested the two together, and noticed that OOO was a little quicker on the opening, but NeoOffice seemed to consume less RAM. Also, I can switch between documents with the option-tilde in NeoOffice, and I can&#8217;t do that in OpenOffice, which is a little annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmfnyc</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116629</link>
		<dc:creator>cmfnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116629</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thorough review, which has me excited that I might finally be able to finally knockout Office from my system. While I love most features of Pages '08, it is still a .doc world. Pages does a good job of exporting to .doc, but it's not flawless. So I've needed Word for final cleanup. If OpenOffice makes a near perfect export, that changes everything. The same goes for Calc. I like Numbers, but it's definitely 1.0 software. If Calc has what Numbers doesn't, then I'm covered there. Keynote is untouchable, so no worries there.

What's most exciting is that I may finally be able to wean my staff off Word. They are unhappy with Word, but reluctant to embrace Pages (having to zip archive every email attachment, if you don't use Mail, doesn't exactly inspire). Adopting OpenOffice will be an easier sell. Which makes me think...I can create our reporting templates in the far better page layout application Pages and have them use the .doc export in OpenOffice.  Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thorough review, which has me excited that I might finally be able to finally knockout Office from my system. While I love most features of Pages &#8216;08, it is still a .doc world. Pages does a good job of exporting to .doc, but it&#8217;s not flawless. So I&#8217;ve needed Word for final cleanup. If OpenOffice makes a near perfect export, that changes everything. The same goes for Calc. I like Numbers, but it&#8217;s definitely 1.0 software. If Calc has what Numbers doesn&#8217;t, then I&#8217;m covered there. Keynote is untouchable, so no worries there.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s most exciting is that I may finally be able to wean my staff off Word. They are unhappy with Word, but reluctant to embrace Pages (having to zip archive every email attachment, if you don&#8217;t use Mail, doesn&#8217;t exactly inspire). Adopting OpenOffice will be an easier sell. Which makes me think&#8230;I can create our reporting templates in the far better page layout application Pages and have them use the .doc export in OpenOffice.  Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/05/12/openofficeorg-30-beta-rocks-aqua-on-intel/#comment-116628</link>
		<dc:creator>Galley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3207#comment-116628</guid>
		<description>You wouldn't like me then.  I use spreadsheets to create business forms, and they look damn good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t like me then.  I use spreadsheets to create business forms, and they look damn good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
