<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Versions for Mac now in public beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2008/06/05/versions-for-mac-now-in-public-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/06/05/versions-for-mac-now-in-public-beta/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/06/05/versions-for-mac-now-in-public-beta/#comment-117424</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3433#comment-117424</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I've got a question about Quick time pro 7 but don't know where to go with it. I used to put a copyright (not sure what to call it but something like watermark or annotation) on my videos edited with Quicktime Pro 6 but can't do it with the new one.
Any suggestions would be gratefully received,
Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;ve got a question about Quick time pro 7 but don&#8217;t know where to go with it. I used to put a copyright (not sure what to call it but something like watermark or annotation) on my videos edited with Quicktime Pro 6 but can&#8217;t do it with the new one.<br />
Any suggestions would be gratefully received,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mower</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/06/05/versions-for-mac-now-in-public-beta/#comment-117307</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3433#comment-117307</guid>
		<description>If my reading of the Versions pages is right they use embedded libsvn. It's a guess but your problems with app incompatibility may be down to their using a libsvn from a newer version of Subversion than XCode. It has "upgraded" your working copy and XCode can no longer read the metadata.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my reading of the Versions pages is right they use embedded libsvn. It&#8217;s a guess but your problems with app incompatibility may be down to their using a libsvn from a newer version of Subversion than XCode. It has &#8220;upgraded&#8221; your working copy and XCode can no longer read the metadata.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/06/05/versions-for-mac-now-in-public-beta/#comment-117274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=3433#comment-117274</guid>
		<description>I really love it. I never heard of it til yesterday and it works perfectly. I'm used to meld, which is brilliant, and the file comparison is far better than Versions but considering there doesn't seem to be any competition (other than meld ported using macports) then I'm pretty happy.

Anyone got any ideas on pricing for this come July?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love it. I never heard of it til yesterday and it works perfectly. I&#8217;m used to meld, which is brilliant, and the file comparison is far better than Versions but considering there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any competition (other than meld ported using macports) then I&#8217;m pretty happy.</p>
<p>Anyone got any ideas on pricing for this come July?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
