<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Farting iPhones: Where should Apple draw the line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weekly App Store Roundup: Dec. 27, 2008 &#124; TheAppleBlog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-28104</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly App Store Roundup: Dec. 27, 2008 &#124; TheAppleBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-28104</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s it for the 2008. I&#8217;ll be back next year with the first weekly roundup of 2009. Here&#8217;s hoping we see more polished, useful and entertaining apps and fewer shoddy, flatulence-based cash-ins. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s it for the 2008. I&#8217;ll be back next year with the first weekly roundup of 2009. Here&#8217;s hoping we see more polished, useful and entertaining apps and fewer shoddy, flatulence-based cash-ins. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: App Store Deal of the Week: Effector &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23779</link>
		<dc:creator>App Store Deal of the Week: Effector &#124; The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23779</guid>
		<description>[...] two months ago, we penned the sad news that Air-O-Matic&#8217;s &#8220;Pull My Finger&#8221; application was denied from entry to the App [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two months ago, we penned the sad news that Air-O-Matic&#8217;s &#8220;Pull My Finger&#8221; application was denied from entry to the App [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Covers App Store Denials with NDA &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23778</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Covers App Store Denials with NDA &#124; The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23778</guid>
		<description>[...] of seemingly useful applications like Podcaster for example (and some not so useful apps like Pull My Finger, which I totally would have paid $.99 for!), and Apple&#8217;s not exactly the, um, apple of our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of seemingly useful applications like Podcaster for example (and some not so useful apps like Pull My Finger, which I totally would have paid $.99 for!), and Apple&#8217;s not exactly the, um, apple of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aztecprowler</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23763</link>
		<dc:creator>aztecprowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23763</guid>
		<description>I believe my app might have been the first app like this rejected by Apple.  My biggest complaint with Apple rejecting my app relates to the fact that Apple has no issues with selling music with very explicit and vulgar language.  In addition, Apple sells and rents movies that would be considered unacceptable by some individuals.  I believe users should have to the right to choose and not have Apple make that decision for them.  If Apple wants to protect their users, add content ratings to the apps. I have a list of users wanting to buy my application so my only resort at this time is to use adhoc distribution which I plan to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe my app might have been the first app like this rejected by Apple.  My biggest complaint with Apple rejecting my app relates to the fact that Apple has no issues with selling music with very explicit and vulgar language.  In addition, Apple sells and rents movies that would be considered unacceptable by some individuals.  I believe users should have to the right to choose and not have Apple make that decision for them.  If Apple wants to protect their users, add content ratings to the apps. I have a list of users wanting to buy my application so my only resort at this time is to use adhoc distribution which I plan to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Broken Record Keeps Playing: Why Apple&#8217;s App Store Approval Process is Broken &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23777</link>
		<dc:creator>The Broken Record Keeps Playing: Why Apple&#8217;s App Store Approval Process is Broken &#124; The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23777</guid>
		<description>[...] feel like we&#8217;re a bit of a broken record on this topic, but I just don&#8217;t think people are grasping how big of a deal this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feel like we&#8217;re a bit of a broken record on this topic, but I just don&#8217;t think people are grasping how big of a deal this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaxzan</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23776</link>
		<dc:creator>zaxzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23776</guid>
		<description>Sorry! ... baked beans for lunch.

In all honesty - without access to the pertinent particulars as to why Apple have taken this approach - imho it is absurd for Apple to expurgate in this fashion.

Apple may well radiate a sense of urbane sophistication, but they do not have a mandate to qualify social behavior across the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry! &#8230; baked beans for lunch.</p>
<p>In all honesty &#8211; without access to the pertinent particulars as to why Apple have taken this approach &#8211; imho it is absurd for Apple to expurgate in this fashion.</p>
<p>Apple may well radiate a sense of urbane sophistication, but they do not have a mandate to qualify social behavior across the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaxzan</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23775</link>
		<dc:creator>zaxzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23775</guid>
		<description>Phffffft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phffffft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landry</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23774</link>
		<dc:creator>Landry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23774</guid>
		<description>I feel burping applications should be the absolute limit :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel burping applications should be the absolute limit :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23760</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23760</guid>
		<description>The only reason to draw a line (putting security aside for a second) is to stop the store becoming awash with useless apps so that you can&#039;t find the good ones.  It gives the impression of apps being a folly, no better than email forwards and not a reason to buy an iphone.

Suitably hidden at the back, out of the way, I don&#039;t see the harm - well, except for the horror of hundreds of kids playing fart sounds on the bus but that&#039;s besides the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason to draw a line (putting security aside for a second) is to stop the store becoming awash with useless apps so that you can&#8217;t find the good ones.  It gives the impression of apps being a folly, no better than email forwards and not a reason to buy an iphone.</p>
<p>Suitably hidden at the back, out of the way, I don&#8217;t see the harm &#8211; well, except for the horror of hundreds of kids playing fart sounds on the bus but that&#8217;s besides the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgar Brown</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23773</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgar Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23773</guid>
		<description>There are obvious problems with letting all applications in, but deciding what should get in and what shouldn&#039;t has multiple problems (including liability). To make life easier for themselves, Apple could let the users set their own policy.

Set a &#039;quarantine&#039; section for applications. Apple could set a policy such as &#039;any iffy application goes into the quarantine section&#039;. If a user wants to look into that section all the customary warnings should pop up, then people can evaluate and download the applications, rate them, and if they are deemed &#039;worthy&#039;  (by the users) could automatically show up in the real store. They could extend this to a full rating system in which user&#039;s evaluation tags the application into specific categories (e.g., childish pranks and jokes, or useless but fun for a while). That way developers could not complain to Apple for their placement, it is their own users setting the policy (and each user can set their own &#039;tag threshold&#039;)

This policy could be extended to &#039;any application that remains quarantined for a month is deleted&#039; or even &#039;it costs $30 a month to keep an application in quarantine after the first month&#039;. Better yet, extend this to the whole store, &#039;if your application is not downloaded more than 100 times a month it has to cost at least $1, and if it is not downloaded more than 10 times a month after that it goes into the garage sale section and you have to pay Apple to keep it there unless you are evaluated 4 stars or above&#039;.

In short, Apple should 1) allow everything, or almost anything, in (i.e., a very clear policy for developers), 2) allow the users themselves decide what is &#039;worthy&#039; of being in the store, 3) allow for the different threshold of &#039;worthiness&#039; of each individual user, 4) set a real cost for the developers to keep crap present in the iPhone store, 5) make sure that really valuable applications that are useful for very small communities can remain in the store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are obvious problems with letting all applications in, but deciding what should get in and what shouldn&#8217;t has multiple problems (including liability). To make life easier for themselves, Apple could let the users set their own policy.</p>
<p>Set a &#8216;quarantine&#8217; section for applications. Apple could set a policy such as &#8216;any iffy application goes into the quarantine section&#8217;. If a user wants to look into that section all the customary warnings should pop up, then people can evaluate and download the applications, rate them, and if they are deemed &#8216;worthy&#8217;  (by the users) could automatically show up in the real store. They could extend this to a full rating system in which user&#8217;s evaluation tags the application into specific categories (e.g., childish pranks and jokes, or useless but fun for a while). That way developers could not complain to Apple for their placement, it is their own users setting the policy (and each user can set their own &#8216;tag threshold&#8217;)</p>
<p>This policy could be extended to &#8216;any application that remains quarantined for a month is deleted&#8217; or even &#8216;it costs $30 a month to keep an application in quarantine after the first month&#8217;. Better yet, extend this to the whole store, &#8216;if your application is not downloaded more than 100 times a month it has to cost at least $1, and if it is not downloaded more than 10 times a month after that it goes into the garage sale section and you have to pay Apple to keep it there unless you are evaluated 4 stars or above&#8217;.</p>
<p>In short, Apple should 1) allow everything, or almost anything, in (i.e., a very clear policy for developers), 2) allow the users themselves decide what is &#8216;worthy&#8217; of being in the store, 3) allow for the different threshold of &#8216;worthiness&#8217; of each individual user, 4) set a real cost for the developers to keep crap present in the iPhone store, 5) make sure that really valuable applications that are useful for very small communities can remain in the store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Pigford</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23772</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Pigford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23772</guid>
		<description>@Pete (#8): No. I actually stated multiple times that the the real argument here is NOT the app itself but rather where does Apple draw the line or should they draw a line at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pete (#8): No. I actually stated multiple times that the the real argument here is NOT the app itself but rather where does Apple draw the line or should they draw a line at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill [again]</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23771</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill [again]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23771</guid>
		<description>Woops, besides, I can give you the real McCoy practically any time you want, or don&#039;t want to pull my finger:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops, besides, I can give you the real McCoy practically any time you want, or don&#8217;t want to pull my finger:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23770</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23770</guid>
		<description>With the large number of iPhone apps, looking through them for one that you need would be very difficult if there are thousands of worthless junk apps. These apps will lessen the experience and make the app store less valuable to us too. I don&#039;t need to wade through piles of crap to find what I need, and I don&#039;t even need one app to flip a coin. I can just borrow a penny at the WaWa counter if I don&#039;t have a coin. Toss them out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the large number of iPhone apps, looking through them for one that you need would be very difficult if there are thousands of worthless junk apps. These apps will lessen the experience and make the app store less valuable to us too. I don&#8217;t need to wade through piles of crap to find what I need, and I don&#8217;t even need one app to flip a coin. I can just borrow a penny at the WaWa counter if I don&#8217;t have a coin. Toss them out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23769</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23769</guid>
		<description>@Josh Pigford: &quot;So while Apple’s intensions of keeping the apps in the store useful may be pure, they are also keeping potentially great ideas from ever getting developed at all.&quot;

Are you even remotely suggesting that Pull My Finger! is somehow useful or great?  Seriously?  And you would consider the usefulness of a phone that farts to somehow improve the Apple image?  Or improve a person, a community, or somehow elevate society in general?

Or are you merely indicating that Apple should have published standards so developers know what Apple deems as &quot;appropriate&quot; in their definition of community standards for the iPhone/Touch ecosystem.

In this case, the developers of Pull My Finger! could have just spent their time knitting a pair of socks as opposed to creating a useless (at best) and offensively juvenile (at worst) program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh Pigford: &#8220;So while Apple’s intensions of keeping the apps in the store useful may be pure, they are also keeping potentially great ideas from ever getting developed at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you even remotely suggesting that Pull My Finger! is somehow useful or great?  Seriously?  And you would consider the usefulness of a phone that farts to somehow improve the Apple image?  Or improve a person, a community, or somehow elevate society in general?</p>
<p>Or are you merely indicating that Apple should have published standards so developers know what Apple deems as &#8220;appropriate&#8221; in their definition of community standards for the iPhone/Touch ecosystem.</p>
<p>In this case, the developers of Pull My Finger! could have just spent their time knitting a pair of socks as opposed to creating a useless (at best) and offensively juvenile (at worst) program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23768</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23768</guid>
		<description>I think the bright spot for all those criticizing Apple&#039;s discretion is that when they start their own tech company, produce their own mobile device, and create their own App Store, then they can make their own policy regarding what apps appear in the store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bright spot for all those criticizing Apple&#8217;s discretion is that when they start their own tech company, produce their own mobile device, and create their own App Store, then they can make their own policy regarding what apps appear in the store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Pigford</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23767</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Pigford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23767</guid>
		<description>@Constable Odo: That&#039;s just it, why do you get to decide who &quot;needs&quot; it? And if it&#039;s a question of &quot;need&quot;...how is an app that simulates a glass of beer somehow more &quot;needed&quot; than an app that farts? See what I&#039;m saying?

And telling someone to get jailbreak their iPhone or just go buy some other phone is hardly a solution here and is a cop out in relation to the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Constable Odo: That&#8217;s just it, why do you get to decide who &#8220;needs&#8221; it? And if it&#8217;s a question of &#8220;need&#8221;&#8230;how is an app that simulates a glass of beer somehow more &#8220;needed&#8221; than an app that farts? See what I&#8217;m saying?</p>
<p>And telling someone to get jailbreak their iPhone or just go buy some other phone is hardly a solution here and is a cop out in relation to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Pigford</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23766</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Pigford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23766</guid>
		<description>@Matt: Everyone that comes to this site would agree that an iPhone isn&#039;t as big of a deal as those things you mentioned. This is an &quot;apple&quot; blog. We write about things related to Apple...not war, politics, income, shelter, food, life and death. You can make that statement for anything pretty much any body says...it really adds nothing to the discussion.

So, back on topic. No comments about war, politics, income, shelter, food, life, or death. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt: Everyone that comes to this site would agree that an iPhone isn&#8217;t as big of a deal as those things you mentioned. This is an &#8220;apple&#8221; blog. We write about things related to Apple&#8230;not war, politics, income, shelter, food, life and death. You can make that statement for anything pretty much any body says&#8230;it really adds nothing to the discussion.</p>
<p>So, back on topic. No comments about war, politics, income, shelter, food, life, or death. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constable Odo</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23765</link>
		<dc:creator>Constable Odo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23765</guid>
		<description>The App Store has been out a month or so.  Who says that Apple may never allow apps to be sold from other sites eventually?  They&#039;d have to make up some sort of license agreement.  Why is a farting application such a necessity.  I agree it&#039;s amusing and harmless, but who really needs it.  The App store gets laughed at for even allowing a dozen Flashlight Apps.  I hate censorship, but I&#039;ll go along with Apple in pulling any app they want.  I&#039;m sure in time Apple will formalize guidelines, but I&#039;m sure you won&#039;t be happy with that either.  You want what you want and think everyone should go along.

If you don&#039;t like Apple&#039;s controls, then jailbreak your iPhone and beg for the developer to download it from his site.  You&#039;ll play with the Farting App for a day and then forget about it.  The App store is doing very well, better than longer established WinMo sites.  What&#039;s with the griping that Apple is stifling developers.  It&#039;s almost guaranteed within a year there will be about 10,000 apps available for download.  Give Apple a chance to get some controls in place.  Keep the App store free of crude or tasteless apps until the year-end holidays are past.

It&#039;s their site to do whatever they want.  Why don&#039;t you go buy a WinMo phone and download anything you please.  Wait and see if there are any problems when the Google and Microsoft online app stores open and see if they really allow anything to be uploaded.  They&#039;ll run into problems for sure

I grew up during the harmless &#039;50&#039;s and &#039;60&#039;s television era and those were good times.  Those show&#039;s scripts were really controlled, but people still enjoyed them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The App Store has been out a month or so.  Who says that Apple may never allow apps to be sold from other sites eventually?  They&#8217;d have to make up some sort of license agreement.  Why is a farting application such a necessity.  I agree it&#8217;s amusing and harmless, but who really needs it.  The App store gets laughed at for even allowing a dozen Flashlight Apps.  I hate censorship, but I&#8217;ll go along with Apple in pulling any app they want.  I&#8217;m sure in time Apple will formalize guidelines, but I&#8217;m sure you won&#8217;t be happy with that either.  You want what you want and think everyone should go along.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like Apple&#8217;s controls, then jailbreak your iPhone and beg for the developer to download it from his site.  You&#8217;ll play with the Farting App for a day and then forget about it.  The App store is doing very well, better than longer established WinMo sites.  What&#8217;s with the griping that Apple is stifling developers.  It&#8217;s almost guaranteed within a year there will be about 10,000 apps available for download.  Give Apple a chance to get some controls in place.  Keep the App store free of crude or tasteless apps until the year-end holidays are past.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s their site to do whatever they want.  Why don&#8217;t you go buy a WinMo phone and download anything you please.  Wait and see if there are any problems when the Google and Microsoft online app stores open and see if they really allow anything to be uploaded.  They&#8217;ll run into problems for sure</p>
<p>I grew up during the harmless &#8217;50&#8217;s and &#8217;60&#8217;s television era and those were good times.  Those show&#8217;s scripts were really controlled, but people still enjoyed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23764</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23764</guid>
		<description>Apple has to draw it somewhere, trouble is SOMEONE will always have an issue with the &#039;line&#039;.. There is no definitive answer that will suit everyone. However, in the grand scheme of things, what software is available for the iPhone REALLY pales to a myriad of far more important things to worry about, War, Politics, Income, Shelter, Food, Life and Death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has to draw it somewhere, trouble is SOMEONE will always have an issue with the &#8216;line&#8217;.. There is no definitive answer that will suit everyone. However, in the grand scheme of things, what software is available for the iPhone REALLY pales to a myriad of far more important things to worry about, War, Politics, Income, Shelter, Food, Life and Death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Ads</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/09/05/on-farting-iphones-where-should-apple-draw-the-line/#comment-23761</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=4421#comment-23761</guid>
		<description>Its quite simple actually. Leave the voting/reviews in place.  Allow users to drill down in a category by stars, i.e. 1 star, 2 to 3 stars, 3-4 stars, 5 stars only, etc. Let the users decide whats good.  Look at Digg.com, (sure its a little corrupt) and follow their steps by allowing the community to weigh in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its quite simple actually. Leave the voting/reviews in place.  Allow users to drill down in a category by stars, i.e. 1 star, 2 to 3 stars, 3-4 stars, 5 stars only, etc. Let the users decide whats good.  Look at Digg.com, (sure its a little corrupt) and follow their steps by allowing the community to weigh in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
