<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camcorders and USB: Is Steve Jobs Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/</link>
	<description>TheAppleBlog, published by and for the day-to-day Apple user, is a prominent source for news, reviews, walkthroughs, and real life application of all Apple products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Reestman</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25146</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Reestman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25146</guid>
		<description>David,

All my external hard drives have had USB and FW connectivity. It&#039;s just a matter of using the USB connector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>All my external hard drives have had USB and FW connectivity. It&#8217;s just a matter of using the USB connector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borden</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25145</link>
		<dc:creator>Borden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25145</guid>
		<description>Based on research my ass....

Apple knows it all.. This is a very simple business trick..

Read the apple message:&quot; Hi guys, if you want the Firewire port, go Pro and spend more...&quot;

That sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on research my ass&#8230;.</p>
<p>Apple knows it all.. This is a very simple business trick..</p>
<p>Read the apple message:&#8221; Hi guys, if you want the Firewire port, go Pro and spend more&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25144</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25144</guid>
		<description>I am curious how most of you connect to your external HDs for backups?  Having an iBook G4, I exclusively use the Firewire.  I had assumed that most people do the same, but after reading these posts it appears otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious how most of you connect to your external HDs for backups?  Having an iBook G4, I exclusively use the Firewire.  I had assumed that most people do the same, but after reading these posts it appears otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin S</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25143</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25143</guid>
		<description>I find all the anger over the removal of Firewire hard to understand. Everyone in my Freshman class got a Macbook (literally everyone, one is given to each undergrad), and I&#039;ve been asking around and have yet to find one person who has used the Firewire capability. Now, obviously, this is not a representative sample--college students are significantly less likely to own $300 camcorders--, yet it certainly says something about the penetration of Firewire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find all the anger over the removal of Firewire hard to understand. Everyone in my Freshman class got a Macbook (literally everyone, one is given to each undergrad), and I&#8217;ve been asking around and have yet to find one person who has used the Firewire capability. Now, obviously, this is not a representative sample&#8211;college students are significantly less likely to own $300 camcorders&#8211;, yet it certainly says something about the penetration of Firewire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klip</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25142</link>
		<dc:creator>Klip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25142</guid>
		<description>And wouldn&#039;t you know it, my HD is shot with a Canon HV30 (see link to my HD vid site)
Ooh well, who needs a new Macbook anyway?  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And wouldn&#8217;t you know it, my HD is shot with a Canon HV30 (see link to my HD vid site)<br />
Ooh well, who needs a new Macbook anyway?  :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMM</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25141</link>
		<dc:creator>TMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25141</guid>
		<description>Roger Mudd:

Slow USB was a Chipset issue of the PowerPC Macs.
It&#039;s been resolved with the transition to Intel.

USB performance on the first MacBook Pro was double that of the single and Quad Core Powermacs in some situations.

USB being slow is on PPC is one of the things that helped to spread the myth in the Apple community that you need to buy the more expensive hard drives, because FireWire is so much better.

It is better for some things.
But not necessary for a lot of things.
You don&#039;t need FireWire for your external HardDrive at home. USB good enough.

And instead of having ANOTHER standard, having ANOTHER type of devices, I&#039;d be really happy with getting rid of FireWire and finally have everything on USB. On one connector which you can find on every computer.

It&#039;s just like Beta and VHS. Or HD DVD and BlueRay.
Get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Mudd:</p>
<p>Slow USB was a Chipset issue of the PowerPC Macs.<br />
It&#8217;s been resolved with the transition to Intel.</p>
<p>USB performance on the first MacBook Pro was double that of the single and Quad Core Powermacs in some situations.</p>
<p>USB being slow is on PPC is one of the things that helped to spread the myth in the Apple community that you need to buy the more expensive hard drives, because FireWire is so much better.</p>
<p>It is better for some things.<br />
But not necessary for a lot of things.<br />
You don&#8217;t need FireWire for your external HardDrive at home. USB good enough.</p>
<p>And instead of having ANOTHER standard, having ANOTHER type of devices, I&#8217;d be really happy with getting rid of FireWire and finally have everything on USB. On one connector which you can find on every computer.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just like Beta and VHS. Or HD DVD and BlueRay.<br />
Get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Warren</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25140</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25140</guid>
		<description>@ Richard Downes:  &quot;Axing floppy drives or SCSI wasn’t so much of a problem as you could continue using your floppies via external USB floppy drives and a replacement was provided for SCSI (Firewire).&quot;

Firewire didn&#039;t make it into the iBook or iMac line until a couple revisions down the line the original couple iMacs and original iBook were USB-only. One could argue that perhaps Apple put firewire in when most consumer DV cameras started supporting it. And then took it out when most consumer DV cameras moved to USB2.

I remember people freaking out that they couldn&#039;t use their SCSI scanners and hard drives and serial port printers when the iMac came out, saying that apple was forcing them to get higher powered Macs when they wanted the iMac. No, they were just making the iMac, and saving everybody a few bucks by leaving out extra ports.

Apple does this from time to time. Every time you remove a feature, it&#039;s painful for the people who relied on it. But Apple&#039;s not forcing you to buy a new Macbook. The old ones are a heck of a deal. And you get a ton of bang for your buck w/ the Pro line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Richard Downes:  &#8220;Axing floppy drives or SCSI wasn’t so much of a problem as you could continue using your floppies via external USB floppy drives and a replacement was provided for SCSI (Firewire).&#8221;</p>
<p>Firewire didn&#8217;t make it into the iBook or iMac line until a couple revisions down the line the original couple iMacs and original iBook were USB-only. One could argue that perhaps Apple put firewire in when most consumer DV cameras started supporting it. And then took it out when most consumer DV cameras moved to USB2.</p>
<p>I remember people freaking out that they couldn&#8217;t use their SCSI scanners and hard drives and serial port printers when the iMac came out, saying that apple was forcing them to get higher powered Macs when they wanted the iMac. No, they were just making the iMac, and saving everybody a few bucks by leaving out extra ports.</p>
<p>Apple does this from time to time. Every time you remove a feature, it&#8217;s painful for the people who relied on it. But Apple&#8217;s not forcing you to buy a new Macbook. The old ones are a heck of a deal. And you get a ton of bang for your buck w/ the Pro line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radek</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25139</link>
		<dc:creator>Radek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25139</guid>
		<description>USB IS still slower and has higher latency then even Fireware 400, not to speak about 800.
On all Mini DV cameras which I saw ($300-$3000) is firewire. And only reason its that USB is not fast enough. Sometimes they have USB, but its only for still pictures. Non of manufacturers will put both intefaces on camera unless its needed.
Only cameras where footage is stored in file on memory or harddisk are using USB, because in this case speed and latency are not important.
For the same reason is often used fireware in audio products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USB IS still slower and has higher latency then even Fireware 400, not to speak about 800.<br />
On all Mini DV cameras which I saw ($300-$3000) is firewire. And only reason its that USB is not fast enough. Sometimes they have USB, but its only for still pictures. Non of manufacturers will put both intefaces on camera unless its needed.<br />
Only cameras where footage is stored in file on memory or harddisk are using USB, because in this case speed and latency are not important.<br />
For the same reason is often used fireware in audio products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Mudd</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25138</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Mudd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25138</guid>
		<description>TMM -- Please point to recent, independent benchmarks to back up your claims. Then we can put the USB/FireWire speed issue to rest.
Also, while you may not require FireWire, others do. There are legitimate reasons for its inclusion. I have yet to see a legitimate reason for its removal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMM &#8212; Please point to recent, independent benchmarks to back up your claims. Then we can put the USB/FireWire speed issue to rest.<br />
Also, while you may not require FireWire, others do. There are legitimate reasons for its inclusion. I have yet to see a legitimate reason for its removal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMM</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25137</link>
		<dc:creator>TMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25137</guid>
		<description>Concerning all the Firewire vs. USB benchmarks:

I see a lot of you post old benchmarks done on PowerPC Macs.
USB WAS slower back then.

It is much faster on the Intel Macs.

I&#039;ve got a MacBook Pro, I am a graphic designer and I&#039;ve never needed either FireWire or the Express Card Slot.

the FireWire &quot;Tax&quot; doesn&#039;t make ANY sense ANYMORE for external storage or cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning all the Firewire vs. USB benchmarks:</p>
<p>I see a lot of you post old benchmarks done on PowerPC Macs.<br />
USB WAS slower back then.</p>
<p>It is much faster on the Intel Macs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a MacBook Pro, I am a graphic designer and I&#8217;ve never needed either FireWire or the Express Card Slot.</p>
<p>the FireWire &#8220;Tax&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make ANY sense ANYMORE for external storage or cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder Luis</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25114</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25114</guid>
		<description>@ Brian Warren

Yep i kne this, but what Apple should have done is include a FW800 port in the MacBook. Because that way you get FW400 and FW800 by just switching cables.
In the MAcBook Pro getting both FW400 and FW800 would be nice too ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Brian Warren</p>
<p>Yep i kne this, but what Apple should have done is include a FW800 port in the MacBook. Because that way you get FW400 and FW800 by just switching cables.<br />
In the MAcBook Pro getting both FW400 and FW800 would be nice too ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25113</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25113</guid>
		<description>I have a iBook G4 and have been using firewire for backups to my external HD.  Its much faster and more convenient than USB 2.0.  Many external HDs require the use of both USB ports for power, where as only the one FW port.  If you are running an external HD and wanting to do other things like Skype using your USB headset, you aren&#039;t able to do that in the new configuration.

That being said, I guess Apple wants me to buy the newish Airport HD and do the backups wirelessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a iBook G4 and have been using firewire for backups to my external HD.  Its much faster and more convenient than USB 2.0.  Many external HDs require the use of both USB ports for power, where as only the one FW port.  If you are running an external HD and wanting to do other things like Skype using your USB headset, you aren&#8217;t able to do that in the new configuration.</p>
<p>That being said, I guess Apple wants me to buy the newish Airport HD and do the backups wirelessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25136</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25136</guid>
		<description>I would bet that if as many people actually used it as are complaining about not having it available then maybe it would be still be in the Macbook.

I like Eric&#039;s point on this. He needed FW, and got a machine that addressed that need and ended up with something that was much better for his money than he had previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would bet that if as many people actually used it as are complaining about not having it available then maybe it would be still be in the Macbook.</p>
<p>I like Eric&#8217;s point on this. He needed FW, and got a machine that addressed that need and ended up with something that was much better for his money than he had previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25112</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why every is so pissed over the removal of Fireware. No one said you had to buy the new Macbook. If you need firewaire so much get the older and cheaper macbooks that have the firewire 400 in them. If that does not suit your needs, then put the money for the macbook pro. That&#039;s life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why every is so pissed over the removal of Fireware. No one said you had to buy the new Macbook. If you need firewaire so much get the older and cheaper macbooks that have the firewire 400 in them. If that does not suit your needs, then put the money for the macbook pro. That&#8217;s life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25135</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25135</guid>
		<description>Richard

I agree I was being simplistic. FireWire is widely used and will be missed from the cheaper Macbook. Thanks. But I really can&#039;t see this as the start of Apple dropping Firewire from all products.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard</p>
<p>I agree I was being simplistic. FireWire is widely used and will be missed from the cheaper Macbook. Thanks. But I really can&#8217;t see this as the start of Apple dropping Firewire from all products.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radek</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25134</link>
		<dc:creator>Radek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25134</guid>
		<description>Somehow are missing from that list MiniDV cameras. Those cameras use mostly fireware.
Cannon ZR line, most Sony cameras. Cameras which record on DVD, Harddrive or memory don&#039;t need firewire, because transfer speed is not essential, but for MiniDV you needed.

Also there was question of speed comparision between USB and Fireware. From my tests is somewhere between 10-20% diffrence in speed, but also computer is much more responsive if you copying between firewire HD then between USB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow are missing from that list MiniDV cameras. Those cameras use mostly fireware.<br />
Cannon ZR line, most Sony cameras. Cameras which record on DVD, Harddrive or memory don&#8217;t need firewire, because transfer speed is not essential, but for MiniDV you needed.</p>
<p>Also there was question of speed comparision between USB and Fireware. From my tests is somewhere between 10-20% diffrence in speed, but also computer is much more responsive if you copying between firewire HD then between USB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Downes</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25133</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25133</guid>
		<description>Eric your reasoning is somewhat flawed.

Firewire is cheap, universal (well, not now obviously) and useful to Mac users.

There has been a tendency among those who are supporting Apple on this move to associate FW with one use, be it CamCorders, TDM, Hard Drives etc.

The point is that FW is all of those and more to lot&#039;s of users. Firewire is used in audio (not only pro audio), cameras (not point and shoot but for things like astronomy hobbyists) instrumentation and lot&#039;s of other uses.

Also, there is no such thing as a &#039;pro machine&#039; these days. People now have multiple computers  and many &#039;non pros&#039; have Mac Pros and many &#039;Pros&#039; have non-pro hardware.

People buy what they need or what they feel they need. It would help a lot if they could count on the same ports across whatever systems they are using. Trying to shove FW into a &#039;pro only&#039; hole just doesn&#039;t make sense. FW is for everybody and has been for most mac users for many years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric your reasoning is somewhat flawed.</p>
<p>Firewire is cheap, universal (well, not now obviously) and useful to Mac users.</p>
<p>There has been a tendency among those who are supporting Apple on this move to associate FW with one use, be it CamCorders, TDM, Hard Drives etc.</p>
<p>The point is that FW is all of those and more to lot&#8217;s of users. Firewire is used in audio (not only pro audio), cameras (not point and shoot but for things like astronomy hobbyists) instrumentation and lot&#8217;s of other uses.</p>
<p>Also, there is no such thing as a &#8216;pro machine&#8217; these days. People now have multiple computers  and many &#8216;non pros&#8217; have Mac Pros and many &#8216;Pros&#8217; have non-pro hardware.</p>
<p>People buy what they need or what they feel they need. It would help a lot if they could count on the same ports across whatever systems they are using. Trying to shove FW into a &#8216;pro only&#8217; hole just doesn&#8217;t make sense. FW is for everybody and has been for most mac users for many years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25132</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25132</guid>
		<description>The loss of FireWire on the Macbook was a surprise to me but I now agree it was a good move for Apple. I am a heavy Firewire user for external disk and target mode use for client support and video editing and backup, so I had to get a Macbook Pro (still in the box!). As far as I&#039;m concerned, I get a lot more for my money than I would have 3 months ago. There is now a clear definition between Pro and consumer Macbooks, which is good.

And as for the loss of target disk mode, buy a £20 caddy, and take the disk out - they&#039;ve made that really easy. And a Firewire 800-400 converter cable is really cheap, so no loss there either. I just hope to God that the Airport signal is better than my Powerbook G4, which sucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The loss of FireWire on the Macbook was a surprise to me but I now agree it was a good move for Apple. I am a heavy Firewire user for external disk and target mode use for client support and video editing and backup, so I had to get a Macbook Pro (still in the box!). As far as I&#8217;m concerned, I get a lot more for my money than I would have 3 months ago. There is now a clear definition between Pro and consumer Macbooks, which is good.</p>
<p>And as for the loss of target disk mode, buy a £20 caddy, and take the disk out &#8211; they&#8217;ve made that really easy. And a Firewire 800-400 converter cable is really cheap, so no loss there either. I just hope to God that the Airport signal is better than my Powerbook G4, which sucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Downes</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25131</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25131</guid>
		<description>Axing floppy drives or SCSI wasn&#039;t so much of a problem as you could continue using your floppies via external USB floppy drives and a replacement was provided for SCSI (Firewire). Technological change has to happen and when something comes along that really provides a step up with what was available prior to the change people generally accept it.

This case is different as no such alternative has been given (it doesn&#039;t exist anyway) so it is a step back. eSATA may be faster in some situations but eSATA wasn&#039;t designed from the ground up to be external. The &#039;e&#039; part was tagged on very late in the day and it shows. USB2.0 doesn&#039;t even come close to matching FW.

I wouldn&#039;t go so far as to say Apple is full of idiots but they have made very stupid mistakes in the past. Those mistakes were detrimental to the company and sometimes put right. The original iPhone pricing is an example of a stupid decision. Apple was derided when it announced pricing and then had to hastily cut prices two months later

I contend the suggestion that only a &#039;small percentage&#039; of mac users want FW so we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree on that one.

Later today there is a conference call and this issue will raise its head. I wonder what they&#039;ll offer in the way of an explanation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axing floppy drives or SCSI wasn&#8217;t so much of a problem as you could continue using your floppies via external USB floppy drives and a replacement was provided for SCSI (Firewire). Technological change has to happen and when something comes along that really provides a step up with what was available prior to the change people generally accept it.</p>
<p>This case is different as no such alternative has been given (it doesn&#8217;t exist anyway) so it is a step back. eSATA may be faster in some situations but eSATA wasn&#8217;t designed from the ground up to be external. The &#8216;e&#8217; part was tagged on very late in the day and it shows. USB2.0 doesn&#8217;t even come close to matching FW.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t go so far as to say Apple is full of idiots but they have made very stupid mistakes in the past. Those mistakes were detrimental to the company and sometimes put right. The original iPhone pricing is an example of a stupid decision. Apple was derided when it announced pricing and then had to hastily cut prices two months later</p>
<p>I contend the suggestion that only a &#8217;small percentage&#8217; of mac users want FW so we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree on that one.</p>
<p>Later today there is a conference call and this issue will raise its head. I wonder what they&#8217;ll offer in the way of an explanation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Warren</title>
		<link>http://theappleblog.com/2008/10/20/camcorders-and-usb-is-steve-jobs-right/#comment-25130</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=7608#comment-25130</guid>
		<description>@Helder Luis

You probably already knew this, but I think it should be noted that&#039;s comparing Firewire 800 vs. USB 2.0, not Firewire 400, which is what the Macbook had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Helder Luis</p>
<p>You probably already knew this, but I think it should be noted that&#8217;s comparing Firewire 800 vs. USB 2.0, not Firewire 400, which is what the Macbook had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
